LIMESTONE CONTACTORS

 LIST OF CONTENTS

  Introduction

  Process Description

  Typical Contactor

  Design Criteria

  Photos, Plans & Specs

  Treatment Performance

  Operational Skills

  Automation Potential

  Advantages

  Limitations & Concerns

  Pilot Plant Objectives

  Costs 

  References

  Contacts & Facilities

 

PROCESS DESCRIPTION - CONTINUED

2.2. Particle size:
According to Rickard and Sjoberg (1983), Erga and Terjesen found that the rate of calcite dissolution is proportional to the surface area per unit volume of media. Smaller media sizes have a larger surface area exposed to the water, resulting in higher dissolution rates compared to the larger media sizes (Cox, 1930; Santoro et al., 1987; Maree et al. 1992; Du Plessis et al., 1994; Menendez et al., 2000).

2.3. Presence of impurities:
Benjamin et al. (1992) recommended that the type of limestone to be used in a contactor should be of high calcium limestone with minimum impurities. Impurities in limestone include iron, aluminum and silica. According to Letterman (1995), presence of silica only reduced the effective surface area of limestone but did not appear to cause a reduction in the dissolution rate of the calcite surface. However, aluminum and iron content of the stone reduced the overall dissolution rate. Haddad (1986) also found that as limestone dissolved from the stone, the rate of dissolution decreased because a residue layer consists of insoluble impurities (such as silica, alumino-silicates and aluminum and iron oxides/hydroxides) is formed and remains on the surface. As the layer thickness increases, the rate of transport of calcium ion from CaCO3 surface to the bulk solution decreases (Letterman, 1995).

Page Number 12