PROPOSAL Part information
Table of Contents
Project Description/Research Plan
Budget and Budget Justification
Facilities and Resources
Data Management Plan/Resource Sharing Pl
Resources for Addressing Grant Applications Requiring Mentoring
NSF Safe and Inclusive Work Environment Plan Resources
Current and Pending Support
The format and content of a grant proposal depends upon the sponsor's requirements. Most sponsors have specific policies and procedures, including guidelines for font and margin sizes, page limitations, and the use of appendices. It is imperative that you obtain the most recent version of the sponsor's guidelines and instructions prior to beginning the write your proposal, regardless of whether the submission is done electronically or on paper.
Many foundations and other non-federal sponsors use formats similar to those used by either the National Science Foundation or the National Institutes of Health.
Most funding agencies include a cover/title page as part of the application process. For agencies that do not, they may require a document that includes the following information:
- Project title
- Identification of the sponsor’s program (Funding Opportunity Announcement or other identifying number)
- Name and address of sponsor
- Name and address of the University
- Proposed start and end date
- Funding amount requested
- Signatures of the principal investigator and the Institutional Official, including dates, titles, offices, and phone numbers (See Institutional Information for commonly requested information).
The Table of Contents is generated automatically when a grant is submitted through Grants.gov or NSF’s Reseach.gov. The Department of Health and Human Services provides templates in both Microsoft Word format and PDF on their PHS 398 Forms page.
The purpose of the abstract/project summary is to summarize the major aspects of your proposed project. The length is often limited. It should be informative to the reviewers and other investigators in the field. Special care should be taken when preparing the abstract as it is often published. The abstract should describe your proposed project’s background, specific aims, objectives and relevance, methods to be used and expected results but should not contain proprietary information. It does not contain biographical information about the Principal Investigator, the amount of funding requested, or similar data, unless specifically requested by the funding agency. Many federal agencies make abstracts available to the public.
The project description describes your project, its purpose, relevance, and implementation. Each sponsor has specific guidelines for this portion of the proposal, including page limitations that must be followed.
Common sections in Research Plans are:
- Specific Aims/Objectives
- Research Strategy/Description
- Methods/Plan of Work
The bibliography should support the research and include all references cited in the proposal. It shows the reviewers that the principal investigator is familiar with the literature and the amount and depth of scholarship that was put into the proposal. It is an important tool for the reviewers when assessing the proposal. Formats for citations and bibliographies can vary from sponsor to sponsor. Guidelines must be followed carefully.
Biographical sketches are often required for all senior and key personnel (principal investigators, co-principal investigators, and significant contributors). Sponsors have different format and content requirements. The NIH format is often used by non-federal sponsors. Sample biographical sketches for the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation are available at the links below.
- NSF Biosketch Instructions, 2020
- Using SciENcv FAQs
- NSF- approved formats for the Biosketch
- NSF disclosure table
NIH Biosketch Instructions (expiration date of 03/31/2020):
The Science Experts Network Curriculum Vitae (SciENcv), serves as an interagency system designed to create biosketches for multiple federal agencies. SciENcv pulls information from available resources making it easy to develop a repository of information that can be readily updated and modified to prepare future biosketches. A YouTube video provides instructions for using SciENcv.
The budget and budget justification is the financial proposal, reflecting the work proposed in the Project Description and outlining in detail the expected costs. The sponsor's guidelines determine the budget requirements and may include policies on Facilities & Administrative costs, cost sharing or matching requirements, and any other restrictions. These guidelines may also outline the format that must be followed and provide templates.
Detailed information on preparing a budget is available at:
The Facilities and Resources section provides information on the resources available for your use on the proposed project. This section should describe space, instrumentation, and specialized service centers available. Identify the facilities you will be using (laboratory, office, animal, computer, clinical, etc.) and outline their capacity, capabilities, proximity and availability. Discuss ways in which the proposed studies will benefit from the unique features of the available resources and/or subject populations. Describe only those resources that are applicable to the proposed work.
The sponsor uses this information to assess the capability of the organizational resources available to perform the proposed project.
Many funding agencies require that researchers manage and share their data. For example, the National Science Foundation expects investigators to share the primary data, samples, physical collections and other supporting material created or gathered under a National Science Foundation grant. The National Institutes of Health considers data sharing essential for the translation of research results into knowledge, products and procedures to improve human health.
The Data Management Toolkit @ UNH provides information to help researchers develop data management plans.
Resources for Addressing Grant Applications Requiring Mentoring
One of the key objectives of external funding for research is the development of the next generation of scientists. Many grant programs are directly related to this objective. Other funding programs, both federal and non-federal, include developing young scientists as one goal amongst the specific goals of a particular project. Funding announcements often require that Principal Investigators or trainees describe both the environment and specific goals that will serve to develop graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and junior into both effective and responsible scientists. Below are suggested resources that assist in developing grant applications.
- NIH: Since July 1990, the National Institutes of Health has required all applications for Institutional National Research Service Award (NRSA) Research Training Grants to include a description of a program to provide instruction in responsible conduct of research. All NRSA supported trainees must be provided an opportunity for training in the responsible conduct of research. For more information on these requirements, please visit this link.
- NSF: Proposals that request funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include a Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan.
Below are suggested resources that assist in developing grant applications.
- UNH RCR Training.
- Office of Research Integrity RCR Resources: The federal Office of Research Integrity (ORI) website contains numerous education resources and products. Visit this site periodically as more universities contribute to the inventory.
- National Institutes of Health's Bioethics Resources: This site provides links for those interested in bioethics education, research involving human participants and animals, medical and health care ethics, and the implication of applied genetics and biotechnology.
- Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty: Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific management for Postdocs and New Faculty is an instruction manual for investigators preparing to establish their own laboratories. It is a comprehensive document with 13 chapters including how to secure a faculty position, staffing and operating a laboratory, mentoring, time and project management, funding opportunities, publications and intellectual property. The Guide was developed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Burroughs Wellcome Fund for an intensive training course.
- A Guide to Training and Mentoring from NIH follow this link to access.
- AAS Science Careers: Science Careers is dedicated to being the world leader in matching qualified scientists with jobs in industry, academia, and government. We are committed to providing all the necessary career resources for scientists as well as effective recruiting solutions for employers. Our mission supports the American Association for the Advancement of Science's (AAAS's) commitment to furthering careers in science and technology, with an emphasis on fostering greater diversity among the scientific community.
- National Post Doc Association follow this link to access NPDA.
- Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB): Provides a selection of Teaching/Advocacy Material, including sample mentoring plans.
New or renewal proposals to NSF submitted January 30, 2023 or later that are funded will require that PIs take an additional step to safeguard participants when engaging in off-campus/off-site research activities. Specifically, PIs must create a plan for a safe and inclusive work environment - and distribute that plan to each participant- in advance of departure for an off-campus/off-site research activity. To reduce administrative burden on faculty, SPA has created a packet that includes a template plan that includes instructions, core University policy and procedure information as well as fields for PIs to complete their project-specific information.
- Keene State College Template
- Plymouth State University Template
- University of New Hampshire Template
- Question and Answer Sheet Regarding NSF Safe and Inclusive Work Environment Plan
- NSF Plan for Safe and Inclusive Off-Campus Research Workplace – Two Page Supplemental
This document contains guidance for completing Other/Current and Pending Support documents. Many federal agencies are revising their instructions regarding Other Support. They request similar, though not uniform, information and provide somewhat ambiguous instructions. Given these factors, we offer below some clarifying statements to standardize and set expectations on what to include in Other/Current and Pending Support documents submitted by the University.
- It is the investigator’s responsibility to ensure the accuracy of Other/Current and Pending Support documents, in accordance with the application guidelines or the sponsor’s instructions.
- Current and Pending/Other Support documents provided by Sponsored Programs Administration staff are draft documents including only the data available within our reporting systems. Additional support should be added as described below.
- Any activity conducted within the scope of an Investigator’s University appointment that provides funding or requires a quantifiable commitment of time must be reported.
- Commitments are regular obligations of time (part of an investigator’s regular activities, except teaching), not short-term obligations, such as attending a meeting and making a presentation.
- Reportable outside activities and collaborations occurring in the summer should be included.
- If an investigator has a quantifiable commitment for an activity but is receiving no salary support from the activity (salary is cost shared by the University), that activity must be reported.
- Typically, activities that provide funding or have a quantifiable commitment of time are Federal or Non-Federal sponsored projects.
- Awards resulting from internally-funded competitions, such as the CoRE funding, should be included only if there is measurable effort, i.e., greater than 5% effort.
- All collaborations and affiliations that provide funding or require a commitment of time must be reported, whether foreign or domestic.
- Financial resources should be disclosed even if they relate to work performed outside of appointment period. For example, if a researcher has a 9-month appointment and conducts research at a university outside of the U.S. under a foreign award during the summer, that activity should be disclosed.
- As appropriate, please:
- Include the proposal being submitted as a pending proposal.
- Address potential overlap or over-commitments. As this is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in your explanations.
- List projects with no-cost extensions.
- Update information as much as possible, e.g., remove outdated proposals or expired awards, unless specifically requested by sponsor.
What follows are examples of Federal sponsor-specific guidance on what they request in their Other Support documents. As sponsor guidance may change, SPA recommends that the investigator pay close attention to the sponsor’s instructions in the request for proposal, policy guide, etc. on how to prepare these documents. Each sponsor may request slightly different information or require that it be provided following their own format.
Investigators and departments should be prepared to respond to a sponsor’s questions about the information provided in Other Support.
Specific Agency Guidance
The researcher may need to complete a variety of compliance documents, depending on the needs of the specific project and the sponsor. The sponsor may request this information at the time of the proposal, or as a condition of releasing the award.
If allowed, appendices may be included with your application. They usually include figures, charts, protocols, and letter of support, as well as other information too unwieldy to be placed in the application. Unless specifically required in the application, they should be kept to a minimum as they are often considered supplemental to the application. Appendices cannot be used to circumvent the page limitations of the project description.
Some federal sponsors do not permit photographs or color images of gels, micrographs, etc., to be included as appendices. Rather, they must be included in the Project Description or Research Plan.
Publications that are readily available should be listed in the Bibliography or References Cited section, or Progress Report Publication List section, and/or the Biographical Sketch, as appropriate, with URL or PMC numbers along with the full references.
The Knowledge Base contains forms, instruction and training material, minutes, policies, tools and other resources to support your research efforts by topic area.
Sponsored Programs Administration
Service Bldg., 2nd Floor
51 College Road
Durham, NH 03824