|Level III Preliminary Process||The process prior to a hearing were a student receives notification and can informally resolve the case.|
|Hearing Panel||The make up of a Hearing Panel and its role in the hearing.|
|Notifications & Deadlines||The time frame for notifications and deadline for information submittal.
|Third Parties||The rules regarding the participation of lawyers, advisors and support persons.|
|Advice for Preperation||How to prepare for a Responsibility or Sanction Hearing|
|Review||The process to appeal a hearing decision|
|Flowchart||An flowchart of the due process for violations which result in Level III sanctions|
|Additonal Questions||Who to contact with additional questions.|
Level III sanctions apply to a report of violation where the highest recommended sanction has a substantial impact on the responding student’s access to academic and social opportunities. Eviction is an example of a Level III sanction. Other examples of Level III sanctions are:
- Eviction Withheld - Alternative Sanction Program
- Eviction from University Housing
- Expulsion from University Housing
- University Suspension
- University Dismissal
After the Report of Violation recommending Level III sanctions is received by the student, a preliminary meeting is required. The complainant will schedule and hold the meeting within two school days of the student’s receipt of the Report of Violation. Before the meeting, students should review the Report of Violation which provides information on with what they are being charged. The student should consider the ramifications of the sanctions prior to the meeting.
At the Preliminary Meeting there are essentially two possible next steps to resolve the matter.
1.Resolution at preliminary meeting. After a review of the Report of Violation to discuss the charge(s) and recommended sanction(s) if the student and complainant agree on charges and sanctions, the responding student will check that they are in agreement and sign the printed Report of Violation form. At that point the sanctions are final.
2.Forward matter to Hearing. After a review of the Report of Violation to discuss the charge(s) and recommended sanction(s) if the responding student does not agree on charges and/or sanctions, the respondent and complainant complete the Preliminary Meeting form to choose which type of hearing the is most appropriate to resolve the charge(s). There are two choices:
a. Responsibility Hearing – respondent does not agree with one or more of the charges.
b. Sanction Hearing – respondent accepts responsibility for the charges but does not agree with the recommended sanctions.
In cases where a student has been charged with a violation of the Student Code of Conduct which would result in a Level III sanction that student has the right to be heard by a Hearing Panel. The Panel consists of three members, a faculty member, staff member and student member. A Hearing Panel is an impartial board of trained volunteers tasked with fact-finding and sanctioning, if required. The time and date of the hearing is determined by the availability of the panel members. Students will be required to make arrangements with professors for any class absences due to a scheduled hearing. A Responsibility Hearing includes a brief discussion of the incident and contested charges. A finding on each of the contested charges will be made based on a preponderance of the evidence. Should you be found responsible for one or more of the charges, the hearing panel will proceed with a sanctioning phase
In cases where a hearing is requested the Community Standards office will email the respondent and the complainant a notice listing all contested issues identified at the preliminary meeting and setting the date, time and place for a hearing. The hearing shall be held not less than three (3) nor more than ten (10) calendar days after the date of notice issued by the Community Standards office. The respondent may waive the 3-day notice.
No less than one (1) business day before the hearing the parties shall:
- Exchange of copies of all documents, reports, photographs and written testimony that the hearing panel will consider.
- Exchange witness lists.
- Identify and present all requests for special accommodations or for preliminary rulings.
The complainant and the respondent have 10 minutes to present oral testimony and to summarize arguments in their favor. Followed by questions from the Hearing Panel.
Hearings normally shall be conducted in private. The respondent’s student advisor may be present during the hearing. During a hearing for a Title IX violation respondents and complainants are allowed to have an advisor, who may be a lawyer, and support person of their choice present in the hearing room. The advisor and support person shall not participate in the hearing.
When criminal charges are pending or may be filed in connection with the incident described in the Report of Violation, the respondent may have an attorney present to advise the respondent. The attorney shall not participate in the hearing.
Parents may wait in the CS waiting room while the hearing is proceeding.
For Responsibility Hearings
- Contact your student advisor. It is recommended that you contact your advisor immediately to allow sufficient time to meet prior to your hearing. Student advisors are trained volunteers with the Community Standards office. Their role is to help you prepare for, understand and participate in the student accountability process. The student advisor cannot ‘represent’ you, nor offers legal advice but the advisor can be a valuable source of information about the conduct process and can help you plan your presentation.
- Review your incident report and each of the applied charges.
- Type a statement that outlines your perspective of the incident that led to the charges outlined on the enclosed Hearing Notice. For charges you disagree with, specifically outline the reasons why the hearing panel should find you not responsible. Plan your presentation carefully, and remember that part of the 10 minutes given to you in this hearing may be taken up with questions.
- Compile all supporting documents that you would like the hearing panel to consider such as witness statements or any document that you believe will help the Hearing Panel to reach an accurate result.
- Prepare questions you want to ask the complainant about the incident report and what they are presenting.
- Be prepared to recommend sanctions to the hearing panel in case you are found responsible for any of the charges. Utilize the Sanction Guidelines to view the typical sanctions for the violation you have been charged.
For Sanction Hearings
- Get in touch with your student advisor the day you receive their contact information and set up a meeting.
- Prepare a statement outlining the sanctions you would like to recommend as well as why you think they are most appropriate. Utilize the Sanction Guidelines to view the typical sanctions for the violation you have been charged.
- Prepare a list of possible questions for the complainant on the sanctions they are likely recommending.
The respondent or the complainant(s) may request a review a final Hearing Order by submitting a Request for Review electronically within two (2) business days of receiving the final Hearing Form.
Basis for Review:
A Request for Review can be based on one or more of the following purposes:
a. Procedural Error: To determine whether the original hearing was conducted in conformity with the procedures contained in this Code of Conduct.
b. Sufficiency of Evidence: To determine whether the findings in the Hearing Form established (or not) the charged violations in the Report of Violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
c. Inappropriate Sanction: the Reviewing Officer will not increase the sanction(s) imposed by a Hearing Panel, unless no sanction was imposed.
d. Newly Available Evidence: To consider whether there is new evidence, sufficient to alter a decision, provided, however, that the evidence was not known to the person appealing at the time of the original hearing.
The Reviewing Officer will consider the written evidence and the verbatim record of the hearing and any new evidence submitted to support a claim of newly available evidence.
The Reviewing Officer will determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence to overturn the original finding(s) and/or sanction(s). The Reviewing Officer will provide a written form determining that the review standard is met or not.
- If the Reviewing Officer finds that there was a procedural error or there is newly available evidence, the case will be remanded to the original Hearing Panel to reopen the hearing.
- If the Reviewing Officer finds that the sanction was not appropriate, the Reviewing Officer will order the appropriate sanction.
- If the Reviewing Officer finds insufficient evidence to support a finding of responsibility or finds sufficient evidence to overturn a finding of no responsibility, the Reviewing Officer will make the appropriate determination and, as applicable, impose a proper sanction.
If a respondent is not found responsible for a violation of the Student Code of Conduct, and the finding is upheld by the Reviewing Officer, the respondent may not be charged again for the same violation arising from the same incident unless there is new evidence. The University or appropriate administrators, however, may address climate issues arising from the case.
- If you have been assigned a student advisor, get in touch with that person as soon as possible
- If you have further questions you can contact the Community Standards office at (603) 862-3377
- Your questions may also be answered in the Student FAQ page of this website.