Skip to main content
University of New Hampshire
  • Apply
  • Contact
  • Maps & Directions
  • Storm
  • myCourses
  • Give
  • A-Z
  • Social UNH
≡

Inquiry Journal

  • Home
  • UNH Home
  • Search

Search form

  • Home
  • About Inquiry
    • Contact Us
  • Spring 2022 Issue
    • Abstracts
    • Feature Article
    • Research Articles
    • Commentaries
    • Mentor Highlights
    • Editorial Staff
  • Fall 2021 Issue
    • Research Briefs
  • Archive
  • Get Involved
    • Submissions
    • Categories of Manuscripts
    • Editorial and Revision Process
    • Writing Guidelines
    • Documentation and Images
    • Join the Staff
    • Publication Agreement
    • Responses to Inquiry
  • Related Interests

Undergraduate Research Journal : Spring 2018

  • Home
  • Menu

Spring 2018 Home

  • Abstracts
  • Research Articles
  • Commentaries
  • Mentor Highlights
  • Editorial Staff

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Comparing Disinfection Options for Drinking Water Treatment

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Comparing Disinfection Options for Drinking Water Treatment

—Alexandria Hidrovo

Drinking water treatment is essential to obtain a healthy source of water that can be distributed throughout a community. There are various methods to disinfect water, and all have trade-offs regarding public health and the environment. For example, chemical disinfectants that use chlorine can produce disinfection by-products within treated drinking water. The Environmental Protection Agency regulates these disinfection by-products because of their potential to cause cancer. Ultraviolet (UV) light is a physical disinfection method that does not produce these disinfection by-products, which is why it is becoming a preferred method for water treatment. For this research, I conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) for chemical and physical disinfection methods. The main factors considered within this LCA were energy consumption and human toxicity risk. The results from my research support my original hypothesis that the assessed chemical disinfection method had less energy consumption and a higher human toxicity risk compared to the assessed physical disinfection method. The results show that each method has trade-offs and that this LCA can provide extensive knowledge on which disinfection method would work best for the Bethlehem, New Hampshire community based on the stakeholders’ priorities.

Read full article »

The University of New Hampshire  •  Copyright © 2022
Main Street, Durham, NH 03824  •  603-862-1234
400 Commercial Street, Manchester, NH  •  603-641-4101

USNH Privacy Policies  •  USNH Terms of Use  •  ADA Acknowledgement  •  Contact the Webmaster