|
Letters
to the Editor
March 5, 2004
To
the Editor,
If I am not mistaken, there is a proposal on the floor to expand
the federal Family Leave Act to include four weeks of PAID leave.
That is absurd. How do you plan to compensate the people employed
here that are not going to have children? What you are proposing
is giving one group of employees/faculty a benefit simply because
they are able to and choose to have children. What you are doing
is giving them an extra four weeks of paid vacation. Can I get those
same four weeks PAID to go and see my grandchildren?
While I agree that it would be wonderful to have the security of
the parents at home for as long as possible, maybe a little planning
would fix that. Talk about elitist. We already pay more taxes because
our children are grown or we don’t have any. We won’t
get to use the child’s education discount. Now you plan on
attaching another penalty to those of us that won’t be having
children. Now that is elitist.
If you want eight weeks to stay home with your newborn, plan ahead.
-- Allan R. Trombley, utilities technician, energy office/ DigSafe
|