The reason the ginkgo has been so venerated by the Buddist monks
has to do with the chemical constituents found in the leaves and
fruit. ginkgo means "white nuts" or "silvery fruit" in Chinese, and
female trees at least 50 years old routinely produce bushels of
ginkgo nuts enclosed in fleshy green casings. The flesh of the
ginkgo fruit is loaded with butyric acid (a constituent of vomit),
earning the tree the inglorious name of stinkbomb tree here in
the United States. But the nut that hides within these foul-smelling
fruits is considered both a prized delicacy and
an invaluable food for long life (longevity) throughout Asia. For at
least 5000 years
Asian peoples have grown the ginkgo for its health-providing nuts,
making this species the oldest cultivated nut tree on earth.
More recently, the amino acid ginkgolin has been found by
researchers to be concentrated in both the nuts and leaves of the
plant.
ginkgolin has been clinically shown to increase the blood flow to
the brain and
But none of this explains why the gingko has been planted extensively in many cities around the world. It turns out that this monotypic genus is extremely pollution tolerant - able to withstand levels of atmospheric contamination that would prove lethal to most other species. Arguably a product of millions of years of growth among highly active volcanoes, the ginkgo now thrives in such smoggy and sooty places as Philadelphia, Washington D.C. and New York City. Other features conducive to urban landscapes include insect and disease resistance and the ability to grow in compacted and infertile soils.
So, is the ginkgo an appropriate tree for sustainable landscapes?
Well, yes and no. Unlike invasive species such as the Norway maple
the ginkgo will never "escape", because the seeds can never
successfully germinate. Thus, a ginkgo must always be planted, and
will only influence the solitary patch of ground that it occupies.
But should a Ginkgo be
planted at all? ginkgos have not been native to North America in
several million years. Should we honor the historical fact of their
presence and continue to plant them, particularly in places where
other trees could not live? Or should we give priority to the plant
and animal communities that constitute our current epoch, and
consider changing our collective lifestyle so that plants other
than ginkgos can continue to live among us? What do you think?
more Ginkgo photos
back to James Hall
about the New England Ecological Garden