FALL 2007 FINAL STANDINGS!*
Learn more about the Fall 2007 Challenge winners!
-
1st Place: Hunter Hall reduced energy use per capita by approximately 27%!
-
2nd Place: The Upper Quad did a great job of saving water! These halls share a water system, and combined they saved an average of 35% over their three year baseline water use!
- 3rd Place: Gibbs Hall reduced its energy use per capita by approximately 22%!
Overall combined savings: • 227,600 kilowatt hours in electricity • $45,000 in energy and water costs • 117 metric ton equivalents of carbon dioxide
• Emissions reduction the equivalent of 272 barrels of oil or not driving 25 passenger cars for one year! •
Overall Rank |
Building |
% Change in Energy Usage |
|
Rank |
Building |
% Change in Water Usage |
1 |
Hunter Hall |
- 27% |
|
1 |
Hunter Hall |
- 45% |
2 |
Upper Quad (Randall, Hitchock, and Devine Halls)** |
- 22% |
|
2 |
Upper Quad (Randall, Hitchock, and Devine Halls)** |
- 35% |
3 |
Gibbs Hall |
-22% |
|
3 |
Gibbs |
- 26% |
NOT RANKED - ALPHABETICAL BY HALL |
||||||
Alexander Hall |
- 5% |
|
|
Alexander Hall |
-15% |
|
|
Christensen Hall |
- 14% |
|
|
Christensen Hall |
- 16% |
|
Congreve, Lord, McLaughlin Halls**
|
- 5 %
|
|
Congreve, Lord, McLaughlin Halls**
|
19%
|
|
|
Engelhardt Hall |
- 10% |
|
Engelhardt Hall |
- 49% |
|
|
Gables |
5% |
|
Gables |
- 6% |
|
|
Hetzel Hall |
- 8% |
|
Hetzel Hall |
- 39% |
|
|
Hubbard Hall |
- 14% |
|
Hubbard Hall |
- 30% |
|
|
Jessie Doe Hall |
- 23% |
|
Jessie Doe Hall |
85% |
|
Mills Hall |
6% |
Mills Hall |
- 36% |
|||
|
Mini-Dorms |
- 68% |
|
Mini-Dorms |
- 20% |
|
Sawyer, Scott, and Smith Halls** |
- 5% |
Sawyer, Scott, and Smith Halls** |
- 11% |
|||
|
Smith Hall |
- 52% |
|
Smith Hall |
- 21% |
|
Williamson Hall |
- 10% |
Williamson Hall |
- 57% |
|||
Woodsides |
- 17% |
Woodsides |
- 20% |
|||
* More background information on the metrics used to calculuate the Challenge standings is coming soon! *
* Fairchild Hall is currently offline due to renovations. Therefore, it did not participate in the Fall 2007 Challenge.*
* Rankings for SERC A and SERC B are not available as they have only been online for three months and have no three-year baseline data against which to compare current energy and water use and therefore calculate savings. *
** These are “shared” systems that use equipment in multiple buildings that will cause energy consumption to vary depending on what system is being used at any given time.**