| |
The
potential sources and extent of microbial contamination of the bedrock
cores, and the influence this contamination on the TCE-degrading
microbial community structure, will be evaluated while drilling
the first preliminary borehole. Using a variety of techniques simultaneously
will allow us to compare the suitability of each method for assessing
contamination. The first preliminary borehole will be drilled at
a control (uncontaminated) site. The broad-based suite of analytical
methods will be employed to address two specific drilling-associated
questions.
Question 1. What
are the sources and extent of drilling-associated bacterial contamination
on the bedrock core fracture faces?
Three different tracers will be used in drilling the first preliminary
borehole. An inorganic tracer, bromide, will be introduced into
the drilling fluid to assess the overall level of drilling-associated
contamination. A bacterial tracer, Chromobacterium violaceum, will
be used to evaluate the extent of overburden contamination of the
bedrock core fracture faces. Chromobacterium can be readily detected
and distinguished from indigenous bacterial populations by its violet
pigment (violacein). Dead cells of Pseudomonas syringae, an ice
nucleation active (INA) bacterium, will be used to trace the extent
of microbial contamination resulting from the drilling fluid. In
addition to the tracers, semi-quantitative community-level physiological
profiles (CLPP) and qualitative community-level phylogenetic profiles
(CLGP) will be used to determine the extent of microbial contamination
of the bedrock. CLPP and CLGP will be determined for the overburden
(before and after introduction of the Chromobacterium tracer), drilling
water (before and after introduction of the INA Pseudomonas tracer),
porewater associated with the bedrock cores and the fracture surfaces
of the bedrock. CLPP will be determined by submitting each sample
to sole carbon source utilization testing. CLGP will be determined
using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Finally, culturable
and total bacterial cells will be enumerated from samples of the
overburden, drilling water, porewater, and fracture surfaces using
low-nutrient media and DAPI-staining, respectively.
Question 2. Does
the drilling process contaminate the bedrock core fracture faces
with TCE-degrading bacteria?
This question will be experimentally addressed by determining if
the genetic potential for TCE biodegradation exists in the overburden,
drilling water, and porewater, and on the bedrock core fracture
faces. The genetic potential for TCE degradation will be evaluated
by examining bacterial communities in samples for the presence of
genes that encode for oxidative and reductive dehalogenating enzymes.
The presence of the genes encoding for particulate methane monooxygenase,
soluble methane monooxygenase, ammonia monooxygenase and/or TCE
dehalogenase within a DNA extract from a specific sample would indicate
that the genetic potential for TCE biodegradation exists within
that bacterial community. In order to test this hypothesis, specific
primers will be used to amplify these genes by PCR. Specific PCR
products will be identified by their sizes on agarose gels.
If the genetic potential for TCE biodegradation is not introduced
into the bedrock during drilling, then bacterial contamination associated
with the drilling process will not impact our microbiological experimentation
in Phase III. However, if this potential is introduced during drilling,
then the broad-based approach we will use to determine the sources
and extent of this contamination will be an integral component of
our interpretation of data obtained in the Phase III microbiological
experiments.
|
|