Investigation & Prosecution in Child Sexual Abuse: 

An Annotated Bibliography

Theodore P. Cross

Lisa M. Jones

Wendy Walsh

Monique Simone

Elise Cantor

Crimes Against Children Research Center

 

 

This bibliography aims to present annotated references on all articles and monographs on the investigation and prosecution of child maltreatment.  It includes as well works on multidisciplinary investigation teams and Children’s Advocacy Centers.  It is a work in progress.  New references need to be added, and in many cases, references are provided without abstracts – these gaps will be filled in.  Every quarter we plan to add new material to cover the literature more completely and keep up with new work.  Currently it focuses on forensic investigation, but more material will be added on CPS and medical investigations as well.  The bibliography is offered in two different orders: alphabetically by authors’ last name (following the rules of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association) and by topic area. 

 

We hope these references will be helpful.  Please visit your local library to obtain copies of listed articles.  We regret that we are unable to provide copies of articles upon request. 

 

If you have feedback on this bibliography, or would like to contribute references or abstracts, please contact Monique Simone at monique.simone@unh.edu or 603-862-4735.

 

We hope you find this useful.

 

BY AUTHOR                 BY TOPIC

 

                                                                                                                        [Updated June 2001]

 

 

BY AUTHOR

 

Baum, E., Grodin, M. A., Alpert, J. J., & Glantz, L. (1987). Child sexual abuse, criminal justice, and the pediatrician. Pediatrics, 79(3), 437-439.

 

[WW]

 

 

Beauchamp, B. (2001). Belief in the future is based upon belief in the present:  A discussion about program evaluation and children's advocacy centers. Paper presented at the 17th National Symposium on Child Abuse, Huntsville, AL.

 

 

 

Berliner, L., & Conte, J. R. (1995). The effects of disclosure and intervention on sexually abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(3), 371-384.

 

This study was a retrospective examination of the impact of disclosure and subsequent interventions for sexual abuse victims.  Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from 82 sexual abuse victims and their families about their experiences with different post-disclosure interventions.  Having contact with a greater number of professionals following disclosure was related to greater negative impact of the abuse.  Testifying in court had no relationship to impact.  Qualitative data revealed that most children had positive associations to system interventions, particularly when they felt that they had been treated in a respectful and caring manner. [LJ]

 

 

Bishop, S. J., Murphy, J. M., Jellinek, M. S., Quinn, S. D., & Poitrast, J. F. G. (1992). Protecting seriously mistreated children: Time delays in a court sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 465-474.

 

[TC]

 

 

Bradshaw, T. L. M., Alan E. (1990). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Factors that influence the legal disposition of child sexual abuses cases. Crime & Delinquency, 36(2), 276-285.

 

This study abstracted data from 350 child sexual abuse cases referred for prosecution in Ector County (Odessa) Texas between 1975 and 1987.  In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, presence of medical evidence and presence of a statement by the offender significantly predicted plea or conviction, together explaining 16% of the variance.  Victim age and seriousness of the offense were not significant predictors.  Shorter interval from abuse to reporting was associated with plea or conviction in a bivariate analysis.  But it had no significant effect in the multiple regression after controlling for medical evidence and offender statement, perhaps because the interval from abuse to reporting acted indirectly by changing the likelihood of medical evidence or offender statement.  The authors suggest that traditional prosecution methods apply to child sexual abuse cases, and recommend increased interagency cooperation. [TC]

 

 

Brannon, C. L. (1994). The trauma of testifying in court for child victims of sexual assault v. the accused's rights to confrontation. Law & Psychology Review, 18, 439-460.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Brewer, K. D., Rowe, D. M., & Brewer, D. D. (1997). Factors related to prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6(1), 91-111.

 

 

 

Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children.  Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(1), 71-84.

 

This study examines the role of a consulting forensic team approach to criminal child abuse cases.  The forensic team was created in 1985 to improve criminal prosecutions and to provide additional expertise to child abuse cases.  Professionals (n=18) who had referred cases for consultative services were interviewed to evaluate the service. In other words, consumers of the service were interviewed rather than providers of the service as in other studies.  All respondents agreed that the team provided missing expertise.  A majority of respondents (83%) agreed that the team alleviated ambiguities in the case, made possible resolution of cases that might otherwise remain unresolved (67%), and made possible progress of cases that would otherwise be delayed (56%).  The general consensus to the open ended discussion about the overall value of the team was that the team was helpful, but not critical.  However, in one-third of the cases, the respondents volunteered that it was because of the team that an appropriate result was reached.  Not all results were positive.  The team did not resolve all of the cases, and the team's role and ability to resolve disputes was unclear.  Limitations of the study were the small sample size and lack of a comparison group.  However, an overwhelming majority agreed that the team provided moral support and improved confidence that the case was being managed correctly. [WW]

 

 

Bulkey, J. A. (1992). The prosecution's use of social science expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases:  National trends and recommendations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(2), 73-93.

 

 

 

Bulkley, J. (1988). Legal proceedings, reforms, and emerging issues in child sexual abuse cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6(2), 153-180.

 

 

 

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). What is the sequence of events in the criminal justice system?, [On-Line]. Adapted from "The challenge of crime in a free society." by the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, 1967.  This revision is a result of the Symposium on the 30th Anniversary of the President's Commission. Available: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/flowchart.htm [2001, March].

 

 

 

Cashmore, J., & Horsky, M. (1988). The prosecution of child sexual assault. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, 241-252.

 

 

 

Champion, D. J. (1988). Child sexual abusers and sentencing severity. Federal Probation, 52(1), 53-57.

 

[TC]

 

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. (1987). Response of social service and criminal justice agencies to child sexual abuse complaints. Response, 10(3), 7-13.

 

This research examined the actions taken by social service and criminal justice agencies in all founded child sexual abuse cases in two counties.  The sample was a random sample survey of 183 closed social service cases and 205 closed police cases.  Of the social service cases, 21% were closed in less than 1 month and about 80% were closed in 12 months or less.  Child welfare agencies took action in only 41% of the founded cases, which means that 59% of the founded cases received neither juvenile court action nor service agreements through social services.  When action was taken, the most frequent action taken was temporary removal of child from home (71% of cases).  Other actions were child placed in foster care (41%), child placed with family, friend, others (44%), child welfare agency service given protective supervision of child (60%), and abuser removed from home (62%).  Counseling was ordered for 44% of the children in child welfare founded complaints.  Counseling was order for 56% of the abusers, 65% through court mandate and 35% through informal agreements.  Response of the justice system indicated that the abuser was arrested 51% of the time.  Convicted abusers were incarcerated in 60% of the cases, with 59% of the sentences involving 12 months or less. Less than half of the cases (41%) resulted in civil actions or informal service agreements.  Therefore, 59% received neither juvenile court action nor service agreements. Because this study examined case processing in two sites, it is not known whether this research represents the national response of social service and criminal justice agencies. [WW]

 

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. (1987). Are sexual abusers of children treated differently than those who abuse adults? Response, 10(2), 17-21.

 

This study compares criminal penalties for perpetrators of child sexual abuse (CSA) and adult sexual assault (ASA) between 1980 and 1985.  CSA and ASA sentences were compared in 3 counties in 3 different states (N=296).  Alleged child sexual abuse perpetrators experienced fewer prosecutions and convictions, less incarceration time, and more probation for child sexual abuse perpetrators as compared to alleged offenders against adults.  More CSA offenders plead guilty (73%) than adult victim cases (67%).  The researchers believe that this is the result of prosecutors ensuring they have extremely strong cases before going to court. They also state that slightly over one third of CSA offenders received short sentences of no more than 5 months and at least 10% received a sentence of 1 month.  Fifty-five percent of CSA offenders received 12 months or less with 18% receiving more than a 10 year sentence.  In contrast, 39% ASA offenders receive longer sentences of more than 10 years, while 23% of adult offenders received sentences of one year or less.  Offenders were sentenced to probation nearly twice as often in CSA as ASA.  Familiarity with the abuser was more common in CSA, yet only 19% of the offenders in CSA cases were issued "no contact" orders from the court.  Mandatory counseling was issued in almost half of the CSA cases as compared to only 13% of adult cases. [MS]

 

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. E. (1987). Child sexual abuse:  An analysis of case processing. Washington D.C.: American Bar Association.

 

 

 

Cheit, R. E. (1997). Child molesters in the criminal justice system:  A comprehensive case-flow analysis of the Rhode Island docket (1985-1993). New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 23(2), 267-301.

 

 

 

Conte, J. R., & Berliner, L. (1981). Prosecution of the offender in cases of sexual assault against children. Victimology:  An International Journal, 6(1-4), 102-109.

 

 

 

Conte, J. R. (1984). The justice system and sexual abuse of children. Social Service Review, 556-567.

 

 

 

Cross, T. P., Vos, E. D., & Whitcomb, D. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse:  Which cases are accepted? Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(8), 663-677.

 

[WW]

 

 

Cross, T. P., Whitcomb, D., & De Vos, E. (1995). Criminal justice outcomes of prosecution of child sexual abuse:  A case flow analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(12), 1431-1442.

 

 

 

Cross, T. P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., & Ahl, M. (1999). The criminal justice system and child placement in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 4(1), 32-44.

 

This study examines the relationship of criminal justice decision making to child placement and how other child, family, abuse, and investigation characteristics relate to child placement. All child sexual abuse charges referred to prosecutors in four jurisdictions across the country were tracked.  A sample (N=289) of the child victims and families were interviewed at the time of referral and 8 to 9 months later, data on life events (including child placement), maternal support, and child and family adjustment were gathered.   Cases that were declined for prosecution were almost three times more likely to involve some type of child placement and more than three times more likely to involve placement with a relative than were cases that were accepted.  Family disturbance, maternal support, and prosecution were significantly related to child placement.  Abuse characteristics such as duration of abuse contributed to child placement outcomes for the total sample and for the intrafamilial group, but not for the extrafamilial group.  About 10% of children and families were caught in a bind because the criminal justice system did not prosecute and children were placed outside the home.  The findings indicate that criminal justice and child protection agencies need to work together to develop effective strategies to protect children. [WW]

 

 

Cross, T. P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., Ahl, M., Dugger, A., & Pickoff, E. (1999). Lack of prosecution in sexual abuse cases associated with increased risk of child placement, study indicates. The National Child Advocate, 4-5.

 

This was a secondary analysis of data from the Child Victim as Witness Project.  Data included all cases of sexual abuse of children and adolescents who were referred to prosecutors' offices over a one-year period (1988-1989) in four urban jurisdictions.  Cases on average included child victims 10 years old, female, and two-thirds white.  The perpetrator was a family member is just over half of the cases.  75% of the cases were accepted for prosecution, and in 25% of the cases, children were placed at least once with a relative, in a foster home, or in another type of institutional setting.  Cases that were declined for prosecution were nearly three times as likely to involve some type of child placement compared to cases that were accepted for prosecution.  These findings indicate that the effort to protect children from the stress of prosecution may unintentionally increase risk of child placement.  This relationship between prosecution and placement is further evidence for the value of multidisciplinary teams. [WW]

 

 

Cullen, B. J., Smith, P. H., Funk, J. B., & Haaf, R. A. (2000). A matched cohort comparison of a criminal justice system's response to child sexual abuse:  A profile of perpetrators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(4), 569-577.

 

This study examined the differenced between perpetrator groups of child sexual abuse (CSA) and felony level non-sexual crimes over a 5-year period within the same district, and the same prosecutor's office.  Areas of comparison were felon characteristics, prosecutorial discretion (plea bargaining), and sentencing differences.

 

44% of the CSA group was charged with a Felony 1 (F-1, the most severe), which includes Rape and Aggravated Felonious Sexual Penetration, whereas 55% were charged with a Felony 3 crime (F-3, less severe), which includes Sexual Battery, Corruption of a Minor, and Gross Sexual Imposition, and only 1% was charged with Misdemeanor (M-3, Sexual Imposition).  The Misdemeanor was dropped from the study.  The same amount of cases was randomly chosen from the Non-CSA crimes to match the number of F-1 (23, Aggravated Burglary, Attempted Murder, Kidnapping) and F-3 (31, Grand Theft, Aggravated Trafficking in Drugs) cases.  CSA victims consisted primarily of European American females with an average age of 11.13 when the prosecutor accepted the case.   Approximately 39% of the abuse was intrafamilial, 60% extrafamilial.  Boyfriends were included in extrafamilial. There was only one charged abuser in 99% of the cases.   42% of the reported abuse cases stated the abuse occurred only one time, with reported abuse occurring more than 10 times in only 6% of the cases. [MS]

 

 

Dam, C. V., Halliday, L., & Bates, C. (1985). The occurrence of sexual abuse in a small community. Canadian Journal of Community, 4(1), 105-111.

 

 

 

Davidson, H. A. (1997). The courts and child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer & R. S. Kempe (Eds.), Battered Child (5 ed., pp. 482-499).

 

 

 

Davis, N. S., & Wells, S. J. (1998). Justice system processing of child abuse and neglect cases, Legal intervention in family violence:  Research findings and policy implications. (pp. 15-17): National Institute of Justice.

 

 

 

DeFrancis, V. (1969). Protecting the child victim of sex crimes committed by adults (Final Report Child Welfare Research Grant R-222). Denver, CO: The American Humane Association Children's Division.

 

 

 

DeJong, A. R., & Rose, M. (1991). Legal proof of child sexual abuse in the absence of physical evidence. Pediatrics, 88(3), 506-511.

 

[TC]

 

 

DeJong, A. R. (1998). Impact of child sexual abuse medical examinations on the dependency and criminal systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(6), 645-652.

 

This article reviews research about the role and context of child sexual abuse medical examinations as well as the sociolegal impact of medical examinations.  The review indicates that criminal prosecution for sexual abuse is more common than for other forms of abuse and neglect, the prosecutor's decision to pursue criminal charges is based on a number of factors (such as strength of evidence, likelihood of conviction, and seriousness of abuse).  About half of all child sexual abuse cases referred for prosecution are accepted and most result in guilty pleas and convictions.  The existence of specific physical findings doesn't seem to increase the likelihood of confession or conviction.  The review indicates that there is little data about the process or outcome of child sexual abuse cases in juvenile or dependency court.  The author concludes that more information is needed about role the medical examination plays in the process and outcome of child sexual abuse cases.  Areas of research priorities focus on interviewing and obtaining histories from children, demystifying the process how medical examinations influence the child protection process, and describing cases which are not accepted for prosecution. [WW]

 

 

Dezwirek-Sas, L. (1992). Empowering child witnesses for sexual abuse prosecution. In H. F. Dent, R. (Ed.), Children as Witnesses (pp. 181-199). Chichester, West: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Dible, D. A., & Teske, R. H. C. (1993). An analysis of the prosecutory effects of a child sexual abuse victim-witness program. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 79-85.

 

This study assessed the effects of a specialized victim-witness unit for child sexual abuse cases.  This case study included all child sexual abuse cases prosecuted by the District Attorney's office of Collin County, Texas from 1983 through 1989.  The 352 cases were divided into two categories: those prosecuted before or after August 17, 1985 when Texas established a victim-witness assistance program.  The program was created to provide support services for victims and their families throughout the stages of the criminal justice system.  The assessment of the program focused on prosecution and sentencing implications.  Subsequent to the introduction of the victim-witness program, guilty verdicts at trials increased from 38% to 72%, there was an increase in the seriousness of the offenses prosecuted, prison sentences almost doubled from 25% to 48%, the average length of prison sentences for guilty pleas resulting in prison sentences increased from 9.24 years to 16.48 years, and the average length of sentences for both probation and prison increased.

 

Because there were no control groups and only one agency was included, the implications of the results are limited.  However, the results indicate that the implementation of a victim-witness program has the potential to enhance prosecution and sentencing of child sexual abuse cases. [WW]

 

 

Dolan, K. J. (1984). Evaluation of outcomes for reported cases of child sexual abuse in Texas. Victimology:  An International Journal, 9(3-4), 383-397.

 

 

 

Ells, M. (2000, March). Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse (Originally Printed November 1998), [On-Line]. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Available: www.ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/portable_guides/forming/forward.html [2001, March 23].

 

 

 

Elstein, S. G., Smith, B. E., & Davidson, H. (1996). The use of closed-circuit television and videotaped testimony in child sexual abuse trials: An evaluation of BJA's funding program (Final Report ). Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.

 

 

 

Faller, K. C., & Henry, J. (2000). Child sexual abuse:  A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1215-1225.

 

This exploratory study examined processes and outcomes for 323 criminal court cases (1988-1998) in a relatively small Midwestern United States community.  The community developed a case management plan in 1985 with the following special components, among others:

 

·           Coordination between CPS and law enforcement

·           Videotapes of child interviews are made whenever possible and used in the interrogation of suspects

·           Non-confessing suspects are offered polygraph examinations

 

The % of cases with CPS involvement declined dramatically over the study period, due, the authors suggest, to increasing caseloads and a consequent limitation on CPS involvement in non-caretaker cases.   73% of child interviews were videotaped.  38% of offenders were polygraphed, with the polygrapher diagnosing deception in 63% of the polygraphs and the offender confessing in 9% of polygraphs.  64% of offenders confessed during the investigation and 76% pleaded to some form of criminal sexual conduct in the target case or another.  69% of cases charged, with the most common reason for not charging being passing the polygraph.  Only 15 cases (5%) went to trial, with 6 convictions.  76% of offenders received some sort of sentence.  Less than 10% of children had to be placed outsider the home.  The authors report that the rates of charging, confession, plea and child placement compare favorably to other studies.  The confession rate is especially notable because it referred exclusively to sex crimes, and excluded bargaining to plead to a non-sexual crime.  Based in part on discussions with community professionals, the authors attribute the community's success to effective collaboration among agencies, although this conclusion must be tentative without more process data and a comparison group. [TC]

 

 

Finkelhor, D. (1983). Removing the child- prosecuting the offender in cases of sexual abuse: Evidence from the National Reporting System for Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 195-205.

 

 

 

Fleiss, J. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Dubro, A. F. (1986). The logistic regression analysis of psychiatric data. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 20(3), 145-209.

 

 

 

Flin, R. H. (1992). Child witnesses in British courts. In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and the law:  International perspectives (pp. 365-373). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.

 

 

 

Fridell, L. A. (1991). Intrafamilial child sexual abuse treatment:  Prosecution following expulsion. Child abuse and neglect, 15, 587-592.

 

 

 

Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(5), 401-421.

 

This study assesses the effects of organizational variables such as organizational climate and interorganizational relationships on service quality (comprehensiveness, continuity, caseworker availability, and responsiveness) and outcomes.  A quasi-experimental longitudinal design was used.  Qualitative and quantitative data over a 3-year period was collected by 32 public children's services offices located in 12 pilot counties and 12 matched control counties.  The 250 children in the study had been placed in state custody for at least 1 year by juvenile and family court judges for neglect, abuse, status offenses, or delinquent behavior.  A goal of the pilot project was to improve service coordination (authorization, accountability, and monitoring procedures) in order to enhance the quality and outcomes of services provided to children.  Linear structural equation analysis was used to examine the relationships between organizational climate and service outcomes.  Improvements in psychosocial functioning were significantly greater for children served by offices with more positive climates (including low conflict, cooperation, role clarity, and personalization).  In contrast, interorganizational coordination had a negative effect on service quality and effect on outcomes. Teachers' descriptions of children's psychosocial functioning were found to be better indicators of outcomes than were parents' descriptions.  Findings suggest that service effectiveness is related more to organizational climate, the service provider attitudes that characterize a given service system, than to service system configurations. [WW]

 

 

Goldstein, J., & Griffin, E. (1993). The use of a physician-social worker team in the evaluation of sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(2), 85-93.

 

This study describes five years' experience establishing and developing a physician-social worker team for the evidentiary evaluation of child sexual abuse.  The center is located in an area of northern San Diego County.  The evaluation consists of a videotaped interview and a physical examination where the physician and social worker function as a unit.  Three benefits of a strong physician-social worker team were identified.  First, the partnership serves as a reminder than the child's history and physical examination are linked and provide more information together than alone.  Second, the team emphasizes and reinforces the healing aspects of this work by providing gradual transitions for children. The team enhances the family's security by providing a comprehensive and therapeutic evaluation. Third, the team provides an avenue for dialogue and support for the team members.  The authors conclude that a strong successful team is built on good communication and the availability of each partner.  [WW]

 

 

Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court:  Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. (Vol. 57). Chicago, IL: The Univesity of Chicago Press.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Graves, P. A., & Sgroi, S. M. (1982). Law enforcement and child sexual abuse. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.), handbook of clinical intervention in child sexual abuse (pp. 309-333). Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

 

 

 

Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice:  The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York: The Free Press.

 

 

 

Harshbarger, S. (1987). Prosecution is an appropriate response in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 108-112.

 

[MS]

 

 

Hebert, P. J. (1987). Sexual abuse of children by professionals:  A case study in seeking criminal prosecution and civil damages. Response, 10(1), 18-20.

 

[M.E.]

 

 

Henry, J. (1997). System intervention trauma to child sexual abuse victims following disclosure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 499-512.

 

This study looked retrospectively at the effects of post-disclosure interventions on victims of sexual abuse.  Ninety children participated from 3 communities with varying degrees of inter-agency coordination.  Thirty children overall were required to testify in either juvenile or criminal court.   Results indicated that higher trauma scores, as measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist, were related to an increased number of interviews, even when other aspects of the abuse such as seriousness were controlled for.  Lower trauma scores were related to the presence of a trusted professional.  No relationship was found between trauma and testifying, removal from the home, type of court, disposition of case, and medical exams.  Seventy-two percent of children recalled their experiences with agency intervention as positive. 

 

Although this study offers important information on the overall relationship between child trauma and different investigation experiences, comparisons between the communities were more difficult to interpret.  Despite unspecified differences in coordination of investigations between communities, no differences were found on child trauma scores.  However, the small sample size and the retrospective design of the study reduce the power of the study and therefore limit the ability to detect such differences. [LJ]

 

 

Hochstadt, N. J., & Harwicke, N. J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach?  A follow up study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 365-372.

 

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect program in Chicago based on service delivery.  Service delivery was measured by the number of recommendations that were followed/obtained by the child's CPS worker one year following discharge.  The sample included 180 children who had been reported to DCFS as suspected of being abused or neglected.  Two independent sources, caseworker and parent, were required to corroborate whether services were obtained.  Recommended services obtained one year after evaluation ranged from returning home (100%), foster care (92%), visiting nurse (76%), and additional medical assessment (66%).  Outpatient psychological service recommendations were not followed as frequently as other service recommendations.  For example, family psychotherapy was obtained 44% of the times recommended, individual psychotherapy was obtained 35% of the time, and additional psychological/psychiatric assessments were obtained 29% of the time.  The type of abuse/neglect did not influence the number of services obtained, but did influence the type of service recommended, especially for failure to thrive cases.

 

Although this study indicates that a multidisciplinary team can have a positive effect on the delivery of services, the study would have been strengthened by using a control group.  This would enhance the ability of concluding that it was the multidisciplinary team that made a difference in service delivery.  The results do indicate that the multidisciplinary team performs functions that increase the probability of service acquisition such as providing "clout" to dislodge services, reducing the fragmentation and duplication of efforts and providing case coordination. [WW]

 

 

Jaffe, P., Wilson, S. K., & Sas, L. (1987). Court  testimony of child sexual abuse victims:  Emerging issues in clinical assessments. Canadian Psychology, 28(3), 291-295.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Jaudes, P. K., & Martone, M. (1992). Interdisciplinary evaluations of alleged sexual abuse cases. Pediatrics, 89(6), 1164-1168.

 

This article evaluates the Victim Sensitive Interviewing Program (VSIP) that was implemented to decrease the number of interviews endured by a child who allegedly had been sexually abused.  The VSIP provides a coordinated investigative interview, medical examination, and follow-up medical and counseling services to alleged child sexual abuse victims.  A retrospective chart review was performed on all children seen at a hospital-based center in Chicago.  Sexual abuse assessments from 1985 through 1986 (38) were classified as pre-VSIP and compared with VSIP evaluations from 1987 through 1988 (226).  There were a number of significant differences comparing assessments pre-VSIP and VSIP; 11% of pre-VSIP vs. 79% of VSIP had one interview, 24% of pre-VSIP vs. 88% of VSIP were interviewed by only one interviewer, 68% of pre-VSIP vs. 88% of VSIP were indicated cases of sexual abuse, 71% of pre-VSIP vs. 85% of VSIP identified the perpetrator, and 33% of pre-VSIP vs. 60% of VSIP pressed charges if the perpetrator was identified.   Because cases screened at this hospital-based center are likely to have a higher index of suspicion, more information is needed about cases not screened at the hospital.  The authors strongly recommended that interdisciplinary teams be formed to assess allegations of child sexual abuse. [WW]

 

 

Jellinek, M. S., Murphy, J. M., Poitrast, F., Quinn, D., Bishop, S. J., & Goshko, M. (1992). Serious child maltreatment in Massachusetts:  The course of 206 children through the courts. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16(2), 179-185.

 

This study followed 206 severely abused and/or neglected children involved in care and protection petitions through the Boston Juvenile Court for 4 years.  The majority of the parents of these children were found to suffer from psychiatric disorders (84%) and poverty (66.7%), and 81% had previously been involved with the Department of Social Services.  Parental compliance with services ordered by the court was the strongest predictor of judicial decisions to permanently remove the child from or return the child to parental custody.  Twenty-nine percent of the children returned to their parents were victims of subsequent maltreatment within the 3-year follow-up period.  The authors' conclusion is that children are not well served by the current legal and social service systems. [EC]

 

 

Jellinek, M. S., Little, M., Benedict, K., Murphy, J. M., Pagano, M., Poitrast, F., & Quinn, D. (1995). Placement outcomes of 206 severely maltreated children in the Boston juvenile court system:  A 7.5-year follow-up study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(9), 1051-1064.

 

 

 

Jensen, J. M., Jacobson, M., Unrau, Y., & Robinson, R. L. (1996). Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse:  An evaluation of the children's advocacy model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13(2), 139-156.

 

This article presents the results of an evaluation of three Children's Justice Centers (CJCs) in Utah.  The authors describe the CJCs and their use of the Child Advocacy Center (CAC) model in investigating child sexual abuse.  The CJCs offer a "homelike" environment for children, use multidisciplinary teams in interviews, and conduct weekly multidisciplinary case reviews.  Two hundred and ninety-four children seen at three Utah CJCs participated in the project.  Researchers collected data on abuse-related variables, children and parents' satisfaction with their experiences, team members' satisfaction with services provided, and legal case outcomes.  A brief pretest-posttest assessment of children's behaviors and emotions was conducted at intake and at a 3-month follow-up with 87 of the subjects.  Child problem behaviors had significantly decreased at the 3-month post-test.  Eighty-eight percent of the children felt "very good" to "a little good" about the interview with only 12% of children reporting that they felt "bad" or "very bad."  Team members' endorsed their satisfaction with the efficiency and effectiveness of the CJCs' services across all sites.  Parents' satisfaction with the CJCs' services were high at intake but decreased by the 3-month follow-up.  Although a control group would have increased the interpretability of the findings, the study nonetheless represents an important effort in an area where there is currently little research.  The lower rate of parent satisfaction at the 3-month follow-up is interesting and suggests further research is needed on efforts to meet the child and families post-investigation needs. [LJ]

 

 

Kaminer, B. B., Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1990). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect:  A national survey. In M. B. W. Sandra M. Stith, & Karen Rosen (Ed.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 549-567). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

[DL]

 

 

Knepper, P. E., & Barton, S. M. (1997). The effect of courtroom dynamics on child maltreatment proceedings. Social Service Review, 71(2), 288-308.

 

 

 

Kolbo, J. R., & Strong, E. (1997). Multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect:  A national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2(1), 61-72.

 

The purpose of this research was to examine trends in multidisciplinary team system design.  Interviews were conducted with individuals knowledgeable about this approach in all 50 states (92% were CPS staff).  Of the 50 states, 33 reported having statewide participation, 30 have implemented the multidisciplinary approach using legislative mandate, and 3 have used departmental regulation or directive.  Of the 17 states not requiring statewide participation, 11 have enacted statues encouraging the development of teams under specific conditions.  States identified the investigation of reported cases, treatment plans, and consultation as the most common functions.  Two-thirds of respondents reported one or more benefit, a majority referred to increased coordination and collaboration and broader and joint decision making process.  Challenges included confusion about leadership roles, ownership issues, and scrutiny of their work.  Although the most frequent strategy to deal with these challenges was training, only 30% of respondents reported their state providing ongoing training.    Results are compared with previous national surveys and described changes in the system design of multidisciplinary teams.  This study suggests a change in multidisciplinary team functions from advising and consulting to investigation and treatment plans.  This study also indicates that law enforcement and legal services have taken larger roles due in part because team activities are often determined by legislation.  Community education and monitoring of cases have become more prominent functions. [WW]

 

 

Krugman, R. D. (1990). Future challenges for child protection teams: Research, education, advocacy. In S. M. Stith, M. B. Williams, & K. Rosen (Eds.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 616-624). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

This article provides a brief overview of what is known about the different types of child abuse as well as unanswered questions.  An overview of the role of child protection teams is described.  Specific suggestions for dealing with difficult issues facing those working in the field of child abuse and neglect include the following; the need to recognize that complex problems do not have simple solutions, that multidisciplinary teams must help fix responsibility for efforts at the federal, state, and local levels, ongoing evaluation must be included in all programs, there needs to be regionalized networks, greater focus on prevention, an increase in training for all those involved in the multidisciplinary team, an increase in the number of treatment facilities, an increase in funding, an increase in political awareness and activity, and realistic expectations from those working in this field. [WW]

 

 

Levesque, R. J. R. (1995). Prosecuting sex crimes against children: Time for "outrageous" proposals? Law & Psychology Review, 19, 59-91.

 

The authors of this article outline the failures of child welfare to successfully provide services to maltreated children and their families.  A lack of funding for services, an over-emphasis on foster care, limited resources, and a lack of investment in treatment by families are discussed as issues limiting the success of service-provision to this population.  A focus on help-seeking and service utilization research is recommended as offering important potential implications for improving service delivery.  Specifically, the authors suggest that there needs to be more research examining needs for services from families' perspective, more research on informal help-seeking by families, and longitudinal research looking at ways in which social networks of high-risk families encourage or discourage formal help-seeking. [TC]

 

 

Lipovsky, J. A., Tidwell, R., Crisp, J., Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B. E., & Dawson, V. L. (1992). Child witnesses in criminal court -- Descriptive information from three southern states. Law and Human Behavior, 16(6), 635-650.

 

 

 

Lipovsky, J. A. (1994). The impact of court on children:  Research findings and practical recommendations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(2), 238-257.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Lipovsky, J., & Stern, P. (1997). Preparing children for court:  An interdisciplinary view. Child Maltreatment, 2(2), 150-163.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Long, G. F. (1988). Legal issues in child sexual abuse: Criminal cases and neglect and dependency cases. In L. E. Auerbach (Ed.), Handbook on sexual abuse of children: assessment and treatment issues (pp. 137-151). New York: Springer.

 

 

 

MacMurray, B. K. (1989). Criminal determination for child sexual abuse:  Prosecutor case-screening judgments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4(2), 233-244.

 

 

 

Mahady-Smith, C. M. (1985). The young victim as witness for the prosecution:  Another form of abuse? Dickinson Law Review, 89(3), 721-749.

 

 

 

Mann, E. M. (1985). The assessment of credibility of sexually abused children in criminal court cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 6, 9-15.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Martone, M., Jaudes, P. K., & Cavins, M. (1996). Criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(5), 457-464.

 

 

 

McBarnet, D. (1983). Victim in the witness box - Confronting victimology's stereotype. Contemporary Crisis, 7, 293-303.

 

The purpose of the paper is to explain the experience of the victim in court within the structure of the trial process, and demonstrate how devastating the legal process is to the victim beyond the surface of the legal system.  The first aspect of the legal system that serves to degrade the victim is the adversarial nature of the legal system.  The author explains that the victim is considered a primary witness in a case, not someone who has been harmed.  But the victim-witness does not have the same rights as the offender.  The offender can chose not to testify, and thereby not be subjected to cross-examination.  Previous criminal activity of the offender is protected from being submitted into court, whereas the victim's previous history including sexual history is a primary focus.   Attorneys view the victim's rape experience as a case to be tried and won.  The purpose of cross-examination is to discredit each of the witnesses.  This includes the victim-witness for the defense, as well as the offender-witness for the prosecution.  Victims seem to expect abrupt treatment by the defense attorney, but are offended by similar treatment from the prosecution.  This paper states the purpose of the abruptness on the part of the prosecution is in an effort to control the victim-witness from giving too much information that may discredit or contaminate their testimony and put the case in jeopardy.   Another aspect of the legal system that demeans the victim is the apparent lack of concern throughout their contact with the legal system.  This is partially due to the fact that the crime is considered "alleged" until proven otherwise.  Again, because sexual assault is considered a crime against the state, the victim is relegated to status of witness.  This means the victim will not be able to testify unless called, and the case will not even be prosecuted unless the state feels it can win.  The prosecutor is acting in the "state's" best interest, while defense is acting of behalf of the accused.  Furthermore, the perpetrator pays fines to the state not the victim.  Victims who refuse to show up in court can be penalized for obstructing justice.  The ultimate victim degradation, according to the author, is the judge's use of power to maintain law and order despite the victim's wishes or well-being. [MS]

 

 

McGough, L. S. (1997). Stretching the blanket:  Legal reforms affecting child witnesses. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(4), 317-340.

 

The Supreme Court has issued six decisions that are presented by the authors as profoundly affecting children's testimony in child sexual abuse cases. (1) Coy v. Iowa (1988) and Maryland v. Craig (1990) concerning alterations to the courtroom environment which would shield the child from seeing the accused while testifying.  Shielding may enhance the reliability of the testimony, therefore overriding the accused's right to confrontation which is considered another truth-finding function in Due Process. (2) Kentucky v. Stincer (1987) addresses eliminating or changing traditional special showing of pre-testimonial 'competency' for potential child witnesses.  The case states "an accused must be afforded the right to conduct a full and complete inquiry regarding a witness's competency in order to effectuate the command of the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments."  (3) An appellate court decision in New Jersey, State v. Michaels (NJ 1993 & 1994) delves into the heightened scrutiny deserved by purposeful forensic interviewing of an alleged child sexual abuse victim.  The prosecution was found to have tainted the testimony of the child through interviewer distortion, thus requiring a demonstration that testimony is pure of tampering.    (4) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) permits a greater range of expert testimony on the reliability of children's reports of abuse.  Factors to be weighed by the court are whether the theory has been tested and validated; whether there are published findings that support the theory that have been subject to peer review; and what is the potential rate of error, along with scientific consensus.  This will also allow courts to be more receptive to social science, according to the author, and allow social scientists as expert witnesses.  (5) Idaho v. Wright (1990) and White v. Illinois (1992) discussed the required burden of proof of reliability before an adult witness can testify about children's reports of abuse. The former case allowed testimony of caregivers and medical personnel, but the decision was turned over because the Supreme Court said the prosecution failed to demonstrate the trustworthiness of the statements.  In the second case, the prosecution did not even attempt to present the physician's "hearsay."  (6) Tome v. United States (1995) regards the admissibility of a child's initial complaints of sexual abuse to rebut to claims that the child was fabricating trial testimony.  A problem arose however when the statements were made after the alleged motivation for the fabrication.  If statements would have begun prior to the motivation, the court might have allowed 6 corroborating statements. [MS]

 

 

Meddin, B., & Hansen, I. (1985). The services provided during a child abuse and/or neglect case investigation and the barriers that exist to service provision. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 175-182.

 

 

 

Melton, G., Goodman, G. S., Kalichman, S. C., Levine, M., Saywitz, K. J., & Koocher, G. P. (1995). Empirical research on child maltreatment and the law. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 47-77.

 

 

 

Mrazek, P. J., Lynch, M. A., & Bentovim, A. (1983). Sexual abuse of children in the United Kingdom. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 147-153.

 

 

 

Myers, J. (1988). Criminal procedure:  Face-to-face confrontation in child sex abuse prosecutions. University of Florida Law Review, 40(5), 1049-1059.

 

 

 

National Institute of Justice, & American Bar Association. (1998). Legal interventions in family violence:  Research findings and policy implications (Research Report NCJ 171666). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

 

 

 

Newberger, E. H. (1987). Prosecution:  A problematic approach to child abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 112-117.

 

[MS]

 

 

Nicholas-Carnes, C., Nelson-Gardell, D., & Wilson, C. (1999). Addressing challenges and controversies in child sexual abuse interviewing:  The forensic evaluation protocol and research project. In K. C. Faller (Ed.), Maltreatment in early childhood:  Tools for research-based intervention (pp. 83-103). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press.

 

[M.E.]

 

 

Oates, R. K., Lynch, D. L., Stern, A. E., O'Toole, B. I., & Cooney, G. (1995). The criminal justice system and the sexually abused child:  Help or hindrance? The Medical Journal of Australia, 162(6), 126-130.

 

This study used a prospective design to examine the impact of the criminal justice system on sexual abuse victims (N = 59).  Parent interviews were conducted and data was collected on child self-esteem, depression, and behavior problems.  Thirty-three cases were committed for trial or sentencing and 8 children testified in court.  Although the majority of parents described their experiences with the criminal justice system as unsatisfying and felt it was overly stressful for the children, no relationship was found between testifying and child distress measures.  Although sample size limits the power of the study, the findings suggest that the impact of the criminal justice system might be transient and less important than other variables in affecting child victims' well being. [LJ]

 

 

Palusci, V. J., Cox, E. O., Cyrus, T. A., Heartwell, S. W., Vandervort, F. E., & Pott, E. S. (1999). Medical assessment and legal outcome in child sexual abuse. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 388-391.

 

 

 

Pardess, E., Finzi, R., & Sever, J. (1993). Evaluating the best interests of the child:  A model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Medicine and Law, 12, 205-211.

 

This article describes a multidisciplinary teamwork model in conducting clinical evaluations of children and families and preparing expert testimony.  The overall procedure and goals of this model are described based on the team's experience evaluating over 60 cases involving child abuse and neglect over the past five years. The team consists of a clinical psychologist, a psychiatric social worker, and a child psychiatrist.  Teamwork can reduce the effects of personal biases, enhance validity and reliability, provide sharing and support, and enhance integration of theory, techniques, and examinations.  Recommendations include a separation of roles of expert witnesses and therapists, utilization of different diagnostic tools, understanding the value of examining the feasibility of recommendations with family members, and incorporating strategies to attain parent consent.  [WW]

 

 

Peters, J. M., Dinsmore, J., & Toth, P. (1989). Why prosecute child abuse? South Dakota Law Review, 34, 649-659.

 

[MS]

 

 

Reichard, R. D. (1993). Dysfunctional families in dysfunctional systems?  Why child advocacy centers may not be enough. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 103-109.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Rogan, M. S. (1990). The multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. In M. B. W. Sandra M. Stith, & Karen Rosen (Ed.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 105-114). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

This article describes the history of the multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect.  In 1974 the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act created the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect to provide assistance to agencies and states.  States responded by identifying the need for coordinating services.  The multidisciplinary team approach was chosen as a solution to this problem.  Although models vary, purposes of this approach include providing a structured format for sharing professional knowledge, improving the quality of services to the family, supporting casework staff and other service providers, and helping resolve misunderstandings and misconceptions.  Other issues described in this article include team membership, the role of a team coordinator, confidentiality, case referral criteria, and evaluation.  A short scenario is illustrated to demonstrate a typical child sexual abuse team meeting.  This overview describes the multidisciplinary approach as enhancing service coordination, increasing communication among agencies, and enhancing professionals' insight from discussing cases. [WW]

 

 

Rogers, C. M. (1982). Child sexual abuse and the courts:  Preliminary findings. Social Work and Human Sexuality, 1(1), 145-153.

 

 

 

Runyan, D. K., Everson, M. D., Edelsohn, G. A., Hunter, W. M., & Coulter, M. L. (1988). Impact of legal intervention on sexually abused children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 113(4), 647-653.

 

This prospective study examined the emotional impact of involvement in criminal and juvenile courts for victims of sexual abuse.  A cohort of seventy-five victims was followed for 5 months.  Anxiety and distress were measured at intake and at 5-months using the Child Assessment Scale (CAS) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).  Results indicated that children involved in the criminal court system whose case was still pending after 5 months improved less than those whose case was resolved or who were not involved in criminal court at all.  Children who testified in juvenile court improved more than all other victims.  The authors concluded that although the sample was small, the main findings suggest that lengthier cases impede healing processes and testifying in juvenile court is not harmful and is possibly a healing experience for sexual abuse victims. [LJ]

 

 

Runyan, D. K., Hunter, W. M., Everson, M. D., Whitcomb, D., & DeVos, E. (1994). The intervention stressors inventory:  A measure of the stress of intervention for sexually abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(4), 319-329.

 

This article describes the development and validation of the Intervention Stressors Inventory (ISI), a new scale to measure the level of stress sexually abused children experience as a result of societal intervention.  The ISI was used to quantify the number of stressful events such as interview with law enforcer, medical exam, court testimony, and cross-examination.  Estimates of the relative stress of these interventions were obtained from 98 professionals.  After receiving the professional ratings, standard stress level weights for each event were calculated using geometric means of the ratings.  The validity of the ISI was assessed by interviewing 254 sexually abused children and their parents about their intervention experience in four jurisdictions across the country. 

 

Early results suggest that this could be a useful tool.  Total intervention scores were higher for adolescents than for younger children.  Intervention scores did not differ for children who experienced vaginal or anal penetration and those who did not.  However, higher intervention scores were accompanied when victimization included physical force or threat of force.  Intervention varied by offender's relationship to the victim.  Extrafamilial cases had significantly higher adjudication and testimony scores, while intrafamilial victims had more protective service intervention.  A weakness of this study was the low return rate by professionals rating the inventory, with 98 of 316 professionals responding.  It is not clear how the professionals who responded differed from those who did not.  Another limitation is that the sample of adult experts rating the stress-inducing events may have had different perceptions about the stress than the children experiencing the events.  [WW]

 

 

Sandberg, D. N. (1987). Child sexual abuse:  To prosecute or not? New Hampshire Bar Journal, 29(1), 15-27.

 

[MS]

 

 

Sas, L. Sex offenders and their victims- empowering children for abuse litigation:  New data . Oakville, Ontario: Child Witness Project, London Family Court Clinic.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Sas, L., Hurley, P., Hatch, A., Malia, S., & Dick, T. (1993). Three years after the verdict: A longitudinal study of the social and psychological adjustment of child witnesses referred to the child witness project. (Research FVDS #4887-06-91-026). London, Ontario: Family Violence Prevention Division of Health Canada under the Family Violence Initiative.

 

 

 

Sas, L. D., Wolfe, D. A., & Gowdey, K. (1996). Children and the courts in Canada. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(2), 338-357.

 

 

 

Sas, L. (1997). Sexually abused children as witnesses: Progress and pitfalls. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters (Eds.), Child abuse:  New directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (Vol. 4, pp. 248-267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

 

 

 

Sas, L. (1997). Sexually abused children as witnesses. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters (Eds.), Child abuse:  new directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (pp. 248-267). London: Sage Publications.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Schetky, D. H. (1988). The child as witness. In D. H. Schetky & A. H. Green (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: A handbook for healthcare and legal professionals (pp. 166-180). New York City: Brunner/Mazel, Publishers.

 

 

 

Sheppard, D. I., & Zangrillo, P. A. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse. Public Welfare, 21-31.

 

[WW]

 

 

Skaff, L. F. (1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, LXVII(3), 217-230.

 

This article describes a nationwide review of the descriptive information on coordinating committees and explores factors associated with committee effectiveness.  The study tests two hypotheses.  First, committee participation will be greater when members are allowed equal power in group decisions or when the committee is perceived to be effective by potential group members.  Second, committee collaboration will be greater if one of the following exists; perceived equality of power among members, a sharable group goal, the committee operates in a neutral setting, the community supports the committee.  The dependent variables were committee participation and member collaboration.  A stratified random sampling procedure was used.  A total of 188 were reviewed and 24 coordinating committees were used to test the hypotheses.  Of all the independent variables testes, only perceived committee effectiveness was significantly related to committee participation.  Member collaboration was found to be significantly related to many factors.  When communities emphasized community wide goals versus individual agency concerns, collaboration was greater.  Equal member power and a neutral committee setting both increased the likelihood of collaboration.  One of the most essential benefits of coordinating committees was the opportunity to communicate directly and thus gain new services and legislation and increase community awareness.  Many committees were able to sustain prevention and treatment programs that would otherwise have been eliminated.  [WW]

 

 

Small, M. A., & Wanke, K. L. (1994). State responses to child maltreatment, Young Victims, Young Offenders (pp. 11-26). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press, Inc.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Goretsky, S. R. The prosecution of child sexual abuse cases:  Part I. ABA Juvenile and Child Welfare Law Reporter, 11, 78-80.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Goretsky, S. R. The prosecution of child sexual abuse cases:  Part II. ABA Juvenile and Child Welfare Law Reporter, 11, 94-96.

 

 

 

Smith, S. B. (1985). Children's story:  Sexually molested children in criminal court. (New Revised ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Launch Press.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1989). The multidisciplinary team approach to investigating of out-of-home abuse cases. Response, 12(3), 10-12.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1990). The adjudication of child sexual abuse cases, Victims of Crime.  Problems, Policies, and Programs (Vol. 25, pp. 104-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Elstein, S. G. (1993). The prosecution of child sexual and physical abuse cases (Final Report ). Washington, D.C.: The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E., Elstein, S. G., Laszlo, A. T., Akimoto, M. C., Ayres, M. B., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Children on hold: Improving the response to children whose parents are arrested and incarcerated (Final ). Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law.

 

 

 

Smith, J. C., Runyan, D. K., & Fredrickson, D. D. (1994). The Little Rascals' day care center case:  A perspective on medical testimony in a prominent public trial. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 3(2), 89-97.

 

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1995). Prosecuting child physical abuse cases:  A case study in San Diego (Research in Brief NCJ 152978). San Diego: NIJ.

 

 

 

Sorenson, E. (1993). A rose by any name would smell as sweet:  Enhancing the functioning child advocacy center. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 111-113.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Stevens, G., Fischer, D. G., & Berg, L. (1992). Review and monitoring of child sexual abuse cases in selected sites in Saskatchewan:  Studies on the sexual abuse of children in Canada: Department of Justice, Canada.

 

 

 

Stroud, D. D., Martens, S. L., & Barker, J. (2000). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse:  A comparison of cases referred to the prosecutor to those not referred. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(5), 689-700.

 

[TC]

 

 

Tedesco, J. F., & Schnell, S. V. (1987). Children's reaction to sex abuse investigation and litigation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 267-272.

 

This study was one of the first empirical examinations of the experiences of child abuse victims in the criminal justice system.  Questionnaires were returned from 48 child victims who testified in a criminal trial.  These children had been interviewed from 1 to 40 times by, most typically, three different interviewers.  Nine children had been required to testify in front of the abuser in a court trial.  Forty-eight percent of the sample rated their investigation experiences as helpful, 19% as harmful, 19% as both and 2% as neither.  A greater number of interviewers and testifying in front of the abuser were related to perceiving the experience as more harmful.  Although the size and representativeness of the sample limit generalizability of the findings, the research offers preliminary evidence that the prosecutory experience is not always perceived as a negative one by victims. [LJ]

 

 

Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1992). Predictors of legal intervention in child maltreatment cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 807-821.

 

This study examined the extent and nature of legal intervention in substantiated intrafamilial child abuse and neglect cases (N=833) reported in Denver, CO, Los Angeles, CA, Newcastle, DE Counties in 1985-1986.  Legal intervention (dependency and criminal filings) was found to be rare, while treatment plan development and child placement out of the home were common.  Of the cases with legal intervention, many proceeded to trial, plea bargaining, and conviction.  Criminal filings were more likely to result from cases involving female victims 7-12 years old, a perpetrator of an ethnic minority or relationship other than parental, severe maltreatment, and sexual abuse.  Dependency filing resulted more frequently from severe and frequent maltreatment, sexual abuse, and abandonment. [LJ]

 

 

Tjaden, P. G., & Anhalt, J. (1994). The impact of joint law enforcement-child protective services investigations in child maltreatment cases. . Denver, CO: Center of Policy Research.

 

This study compared process and outcome of investigations in five communities that varied in the degree to which police and CPS investigations were conducted jointly.  The authors found that the term "joint investigation" was loosely defined, and operationally defined it as involving at least one contact between the two agency investigators during the CPS investigation or one conjoint interview sometime during the investigation process.  Joint investigations were more common with sexual abuse, with more serious abuse and with multiple forms of abuse.  They were more frequent when law enforcement was the first agency officially reporting the abuse, and in the context of emergency medical treatment for the victim.

 

In comparison to independent investigations, joint investigations had:

 

·           Shorter caseworker response times

·           Lengthier investigations

·           More contacts during the investigations

·           More frequent use of face-to-face interviews with persons involved in the case

·           More custody removals

·           More perpetrator departures from the home

·           More perpetrator confessions

·           More frequent victim corroboration

·           More substantiated reports

·           More dependency filings

·           More criminal prosecutions

·           More guilty pleas

 

Joint investigations did not have more repeat interviews than independent investigations.

 

The impressive list of differences between joint and independent investigations is difficult to interpret, however, because they could all plausibly be explained by the differences in the type of cases investigated jointly versus independently (e.g., in  seriousness and type of abuse).  Moreover, there is no way of ruling out the possibility that cases on which agencies decided to intervene more intensely were assigned to be jointly investigated.  The authors did not statistically control for possible confounds, nor did they address them in the text.

 

The more rigorous comparison of communities that differed on degree of joint versus independent investigations did not suggest an effect of cooperation.  Communities differed significantly on a number of process and outcome variables, but these differences were never related to the communities' rank on degree of police-social worker cooperation on investigations. [TC]

 

 

Trute, B., Adkins, E., & MacDonald, G. (1996). Professional attitudes regarding treatment and punishment of incest: Comparing police, child welfare, and community mental health. Journal of Family Violence, 11(3), 237-249.

 

This study the differences in attitudes between the 3 primary agencies involved with intrafamilial child sexual abuse: police, child welfare and community mental health.  In a large Canadian farming community, personnel were sampled from 3 agencies and given 3 previously developed vignettes with 3 Likert-type items each relating to treatment and punishment issues.  The consistent themes of the tests were view of perpetrator as mentally ill rather than criminal, view that mother and daughter were victims rather than guilty participants, and that court mandated treatment would benefit the incest situation.  Police were significantly more likely to consider the offending parent as criminal and to find the mother complicit.  It was noted that the police had more male subjects.  Additionally, the other services maintained older employees. [MS]

 

 

Watkins, S. A. (1990). The double victim:  The sexually abused child and the judicial system. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 7(1), 29-43.

 

This article gives a historical perspective on child sexual abuse to illustrate that child sexual abuse is not a new social problem.  For example, the earliest English rape law appeared in 1576.  Although it is difficult to determine the first sexual abuse case in the American judicial system, a number of criminal cases involving child abuse existed in the mid 1600s.  The 1874 New York case of Mary Ellen Wilson has been recognized as beginning the child protection movement in the United States.  The New York society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded in 1874 and emphasized the prosecution of parents and the removal of children from abusive homes.  In 1899, the juvenile court was created under the English law that justified state intervention to act in place of the parent.  Early advocates of the juvenile court wanted the court to look more like a family room than an adult criminal courtroom.  By 1927 all but 2 states had a juvenile court.  However, the juvenile court had to handle a wide range of problems and was not prepared to deal with the wide range of child abuse problems.  In the mid 1960s all fifty states introduced some type of child abuse reporting statutes.  In 1988 the Supreme Court in Coy v Iowa decided that using a screen in the courtroom violated the defendant's constitutional right to face-to-face confrontation.

 

Even though child abuse is both a criminal and civil offense, the decision to prosecute is complex and differs in every community.  Another difficult issue is that our constitutional rights are more aligned with the defendant rather than the victim witness.  Protective service workers' primary concern is reducing the trauma for the child.  Approaches for reducing trauma have included establishing interdisciplinary teams, coordinating juvenile and criminal court proceedings, providing a special advocate for the child in court, limiting the number of interviews, having special sexual abuse prosecution teams, methods to avoid a child's testimony at grand jury and preliminary hearings, and developing alternatives in a child's testimony in open court.  [WW]

 

 

Weiss, E. H., & Berg, R. F. (1982). Child victims of sexual assault:  Impact of court procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21(5), 513-518.

 

The article is one of the earlier published descriptions of professional concern about the impact of the court system on child victims of abuse.  The authors' concerns arose from their experiences with child abuse victims in Washington D.C.  The article summarizes of the effects of sexual victimization on children, describes the procedures of the three courts child victims often become involved with (criminal, delinquency, and family), and outlines the ways in which the procedures can be insensitive to children's needs and possibly exacerbate the victims' trauma and stress reactions.  The authors use examples from clinical cases to illustrate their points and follow up with recommendations for mental health workers and the court system.  Despite the age of the article, it offers a useful introduction to the concerns professionals have about the impact of court procedures on child victim witnesses. [LJ]

 

 

Whitcomb, D., Runyan, D., DeVos, E., Hunter, W., Cross, T., Everson, M., Peeler, N., & Porter, C. (1992). When the victim is a child. (2 ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

 

 

 

Whitcomb, D., Goodman, G. S., Runyan, D. K., & Hoak, S. (1994). The emotional effects of testifying on sexually abused children (NIJ:  Research in Brief NCJ 146414). Washington, D. C.: Department of Justice.

 

This research brief published by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) summarizes findings from three of the largest studies on the effects of testifying on child victims.  Results are summarized from:  1) a study by Desmond Runyan and his colleagues based in North Carolina; 2) a study by Gail Goodman and her colleagues based in Denver, Colorado; and 3) a multi-site research project by Debra Whitcomb and her colleagues funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). All three studies found that children were highly anxious at intake, but, for the most part, improved greatly over time regardless of their experiences in court.

 

 Findings on the specific effects of testifying were mixed.  Goodman, et al. found negative effects for child witnesses at a seven-month follow-up.  Runyan, et al., on the other hand, found testifiers in juvenile court improved more than non-testifiers at a 5-month follow-up.  At longer follow-up periods none of the studies found significant differences between child victims who testified and those who did not.  Other findings included the importance of maternal support in children's emotional well-being and the negative impact of multiple interviews or testimony and delays in the court process on children. [LJ]

 

 

Whitcomb, D., & Hardin, M. (1996). Coordinating criminal and juvenile court proceedings in child maltreatment cases. National Institute of Justice Research Preview, 1-3.

 

This article summarizes a National Institute of Justice-funded study conducted by Education Development Center, Inc. and the American Bar Association's Center on Children and the Law.  The purpose of the study was to examine the philosophical difference of emphasis between treatment in juvenile court and punishment in criminal court.  A nationally representative sample of 103 criminal prosecutors and 59 attorneys who represent child protection agencies in the juvenile court were interviewed.  The study found that although many child protection and law enforcement agencies work well together during the investigation process, attorneys in criminal and juvenile courts have not achieved a similar level of cooperation.    Prosecutors responded that 60% of their child maltreatment cases were concurrently involved in juvenile court proceeding, while child protection attorneys estimated that 13% of their caseloads were involved in criminal courts.  Approximately half of the attorneys replied that dual-court cases proceed independently, 1/5 of the prosecutors could not name the individual or agency responsible for representing the child protection agency in juvenile court, and several respondents felt that attempts to coordinate would not be effective because of different missions of criminal and juvenile courts.  Site visits were conducted with four jurisdictions that expressed concern about coordination.  Policy implications include delineating the nature of information that may be shared between the courts and under what circumstances and including child protection attorneys on existing multidisciplinary teams.  Greater cooperation is needed in order to protect children from harm. [WW]

 

 

White, S., & Quinn, K. M. (1988). Investigatory independence in child sexual abuse evaluations:  Conceptual considerations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 16(3), 269-278.

 

 

 

Williams, G. (1993). The expansion of advocacy center's role:  Too much?  Too soon? Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 115-118.

 

[CA]

 

 

Wolfe, V. V., Sas, L., & Wilson, S. K. (1987). Some issues in preparing sexually abused children for courtroom testimony. Behavior Therapist, 10(5), 107-113.

 

 

 

Wood, J. M., & Garven, S. (2000). How sexual abuse interviews go astray:  Implications for prosecutors, police, and child protection services. Child Maltreatment, 5(2), 109-129.

 

[M.E.]

 

 

Wulkan, D., & Bulkley, J. (198?). General survey findings relating to prosecutorial practices and policies. In J. Bulkely (Ed.), Innovations in the prosecution of child sexual abuse (pp. 1-8). Washington D.C.: American Bar Association.

 

 

Top of the Document

BY TOPIC

 

Children’s Testimony

Criminal Justice Intervention

Effects on Children

Investigation and Investigative Agencies

Medical Evaluation

Multidisciplinary Teams

 

Children's Testimony

 

Brannon, C. L. (1994). The trauma of testifying in court for child victims of sexual assault v. the accused's rights to confrontation. Law & Psychology Review, 18, 439-460.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Elstein, S. G., Smith, B. E., & Davidson, H. (1996). The use of closed-circuit television and videotaped testimony in child sexual abuse trials: An evaluation of BJA's funding program (Final Report ). Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.

 

 

Flin, R. H. (1992). Child witnesses in British courts. In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and the law:  International perspectives (pp. 365-373). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.

 

 

Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court:  Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. (Vol. 57). Chicago, IL: The Univesity of Chicago Press.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Jaffe, P., Wilson, S. K., & Sas, L. (1987). Court  testimony of child sexual abuse victims:  Emerging issues in clinical assessments. Canadian Psychology, 28(3), 291-295.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Lipovsky, J., & Stern, P. (1997). Preparing children for court:  An interdisciplinary view. Child Maltreatment, 2(2), 150-163.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Mann, E. M. (1985). The assessment of credibility of sexually abused children in criminal court cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 6, 9-15.

 

[LJ]

 

 

McBarnet, D. (1983). Victim in the witness box - Confronting victimology's stereotype. Contemporary Crisis, 7, 293-303.

 

The purpose of the paper is to explain the experience of the victim in court within the structure of the trial process, and demonstrate how devastating the legal process is to the victim beyond the surface of the legal system.  The first aspect of the legal system that serves to degrade the victim is the adversarial nature of the legal system.  The author explains that the victim is considered a primary witness in a case, not someone who has been harmed.  But the victim-witness does not have the same rights as the offender.  The offender can chose not to testify, and thereby not be subjected to cross-examination.  Previous criminal activity of the offender is protected from being submitted into court, whereas the victim's previous history including sexual history is a primary focus.   Attorneys view the victim's rape experience as a case to be tried and won.  The purpose of cross-examination is to discredit each of the witnesses.  This includes the victim-witness for the defense, as well as the offender-witness for the prosecution.  Victims seem to expect abrupt treatment by the defense attorney, but are offended by similar treatment from the prosecution.  This paper states the purpose of the abruptness on the part of the prosecution is in an effort to control the victim-witness from giving too much information that may discredit or contaminate their testimony and put the case in jeopardy.   Another aspect of the legal system that demeans the victim is the apparent lack of concern throughout their contact with the legal system.  This is partially due to the fact that the crime is considered "alleged" until proven otherwise.  Again, because sexual assault is considered a crime against the state, the victim is relegated to status of witness.  This means the victim will not be able to testify unless called, and the case will not even be prosecuted unless the state feels it can win.  The prosecutor is acting in the "state's" best interest, while defense is acting of behalf of the accused.  Furthermore, the perpetrator pays fines to the state not the victim.  Victims who refuse to show up in court can be penalized for obstructing justice.  The ultimate victim degradation, according to the author, is the judge's use of power to maintain law and order despite the victim's wishes or well-being. [MS]

 

 

McGough, L. S. (1997). Stretching the blanket:  Legal reforms affecting child witnesses. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(4), 317-340.

 

The Supreme Court has issued six decisions that are presented by the authors as profoundly affecting children's testimony in child sexual abuse cases. (1) Coy v. Iowa (1988) and Maryland v. Craig (1990) concerning alterations to the courtroom environment which would shield the child from seeing the accused while testifying.  Shielding may enhance the reliability of the testimony, therefore overriding the accused's right to confrontation which is considered another truth-finding function in Due Process. (2) Kentucky v. Stincer (1987) addresses eliminating or changing traditional special showing of pre-testimonial 'competency' for potential child witnesses.  The case states "an accused must be afforded the right to conduct a full and complete inquiry regarding a witness's competency in order to effectuate the command of the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments."  (3) An appellate court decision in New Jersey, State v. Michaels (NJ 1993 & 1994) delves into the heightened scrutiny deserved by purposeful forensic interviewing of an alleged child sexual abuse victim.  The prosecution was found to have tainted the testimony of the child through interviewer distortion, thus requiring a demonstration that testimony is pure of tampering.    (4) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) permits a greater range of expert testimony on the reliability of children's reports of abuse.  Factors to be weighed by the court are whether the theory has been tested and validated; whether there are published findings that support the theory that have been subject to peer review; and what is the potential rate of error, along with scientific consensus.  This will also allow courts to be more receptive to social science, according to the author, and allow social scientists as expert witnesses.  (5) Idaho v. Wright (1990) and White v. Illinois (1992) discussed the required burden of proof of reliability before an adult witness can testify about children's reports of abuse. The former case allowed testimony of caregivers and medical personnel, but the decision was turned over because the Supreme Court said the prosecution failed to demonstrate the trustworthiness of the statements.  In the second case, the prosecution did not even attempt to present the physician's "hearsay."  (6) Tome v. United States (1995) regards the admissibility of a child's initial complaints of sexual abuse to rebut to claims that the child was fabricating trial testimony.  A problem arose however when the statements were made after the alleged motivation for the fabrication.  If statements would have begun prior to the motivation, the court might have allowed 6 corroborating statements. [MS]

 

 

Myers, J. (1988). Criminal procedure:  Face-to-face confrontation in child sex abuse prosecutions. University of Florida Law Review, 40(5), 1049-1059.

 

 

Sas, L. (1997). Sexually abused children as witnesses: Progress and pitfalls. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters (Eds.), Child abuse:  New directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (Vol. 4, pp. 248-267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

 

 

Schetky, D. H. (1988). The child as witness. In D. H. Schetky & A. H. Green (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: A handbook for healthcare and legal professionals (pp. 166-180). New York City: Brunner/Mazel, Publishers.

 

 

Wolfe, V. V., Sas, L., & Wilson, S. K. (1987). Some issues in preparing sexually abused children for courtroom testimony. Behavior Therapist, 10(5), 107-113.

 

Top of the Document

Criminal Justice Intervention

 

Bradshaw, T. L. M., Alan E. (1990). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Factors that influence the legal disposition of child sexual abuses cases. Crime & Delinquency, 36(2), 276-285.

 

This study abstracted data from 350 child sexual abuse cases referred for prosecution in Ector County (Odessa) Texas between 1975 and 1987.  In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, presence of medical evidence and presence of a statement by the offender significantly predicted plea or conviction, together explaining 16% of the variance.  Victim age and seriousness of the offense were not significant predictors.  Shorter interval from abuse to reporting was associated with plea or conviction in a bivariate analysis.  But it had no significant effect in the multiple regression after controlling for medical evidence and offender statement, perhaps because the interval from abuse to reporting acted indirectly by changing the likelihood of medical evidence or offender statement.  The authors suggest that traditional prosecution methods apply to child sexual abuse cases, and recommend increased interagency cooperation. [TC]

 

 

Brewer, K. D., Rowe, D. M., & Brewer, D. D. (1997). Factors related to prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6(1), 91-111.

 

 

Bulkey, J. A. (1992). The prosecution's use of social science expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases:  National trends and recommendations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(2), 73-93.

 

 

Bulkley, J. (1988). Legal proceedings, reforms, and emerging issues in child sexual abuse cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6(2), 153-180.

 

 

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). What is the sequence of events in the criminal justice system? [On-Line]. Adapted from "The challenge of crime in a free society." by the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, 1967.  This revision is a result of the Symposium on the 30th Anniversary of the President's Commission. Available: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/flowchart.htm [2001, March].

 

 

Cashmore, J., & Horsky, M. (1988). The prosecution of child sexual assault. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, 241-252.

 

 

Champion, D. J. (1988). Child sexual abusers and sentencing severity. Federal Probation, 52(1), 53-57.

 

[TC]

 

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. (1987). Are sexual abusers of children treated differently than those who abuse adults? Response, 10(2), 17-21.

 

This study compares criminal penalties for perpetrators of child sexual abuse (CSA) and adult sexual assault (ASA) between 1980 and 1985.  CSA and ASA sentences were compared in 3 counties in 3 different states (N=296).  Alleged child sexual abuse perpetrators experienced fewer prosecutions and convictions, less incarceration time, and more probation for child sexual abuse perpetrators as compared to alleged offenders against adults.  More CSA offenders plead guilty (73%) than adult victim cases (67%).  The researchers believe that this is the result of prosecutors ensuring they have extremely strong cases before going to court. They also state that slightly over one third of CSA offenders received short sentences of no more than 5 months and at least 10% received a sentence of 1 month.  Fifty-five percent of CSA offenders received 12 months or less with 18% receiving more than a 10 year sentence.  In contrast, 39% ASA offenders receive longer sentences of more than 10 years, while 23% of adult offenders received sentences of one year or less.  Offenders were sentenced to probation nearly twice as often in CSA as ASA.  Familiarity with the abuser was more common in CSA, yet only 19% of the offenders in CSA cases were issued "no contact" orders from the court.  Mandatory counseling was issued in almost half of the CSA cases as compared to only 13% of adult cases. [MS]

 

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. E. (1987). Child sexual abuse:  An analysis of case processing. Washington D.C.: American Bar Association.

 

 

Cheit, R. E. (1997). Child molesters in the criminal justice system:  A comprehensive case-flow analysis of the Rhode Island docket (1985-1993). New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 23(2), 267-301.

 

 

Conte, J. R., & Berliner, L. (1981). Prosecution of the offender in cases of sexual assault against children. Victimology:  An International Journal, 6(1-4), 102-109.

 

 

Cross, T. P., Whitcomb, D., & De Vos, E. (1995). Criminal justice outcomes of prosecution of child sexual abuse:  A case flow analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(12), 1431-1442.

 

 

Cross, T. P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., & Ahl, M. (1999). The criminal justice system and child placement in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 4(1), 32-44.

 

This study examines the relationship of criminal justice decision making to child placement and how other child, family, abuse, and investigation characteristics relate to child placement. All child sexual abuse charges referred to prosecutors in four jurisdictions across the country were tracked.  A sample (N=289) of the child victims and families were interviewed at the time of referral and 8 to 9 months later, data on life events (including child placement), maternal support, and child and family adjustment were gathered.   Cases that were declined for prosecution were almost three times more likely to involve some type of child placement and more than three times more likely to involve placement with a relative than were cases that were accepted.  Family disturbance, maternal support, and prosecution were significantly related to child placement.  Abuse characteristics such as duration of abuse contributed to child placement outcomes for the total sample and for the intrafamilial group, but not for the extrafamilial group.  About 10% of children and families were caught in a bind because the criminal justice system did not prosecute and children were placed outside the home.  The findings indicate that criminal justice and child protection agencies need to work together to develop effective strategies to protect children. [WW]

 

 

Cross, T. P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., Ahl, M., Dugger, A., & Pickoff, E. (1999). Lack of prosecution in sexual abuse cases associated with increased risk of child placement, study indicates. The National Child Advocate, 4-5.

 

This was a secondary analysis of data from the Child Victim as Witness Project.  Data included all cases of sexual abuse of children and adolescents who were referred to prosecutors' offices over a one-year period (1988-1989) in four urban jurisdictions.  Cases on average included child victims 10 years old, female, and two-thirds white.  The perpetrator was a family member is just over half of the cases.  75% of the cases were accepted for prosecution, and in 25% of the cases, children were placed at least once with a relative, in a foster home, or in another type of institutional setting.  Cases that were declined for prosecution were nearly three times as likely to involve some type of child placement compared to cases that were accepted for prosecution.  These findings indicate that the effort to protect children from the stress of prosecution may unintentionally increase risk of child placement.  This relationship between prosecution and placement is further evidence for the value of multidisciplinary teams. [WW]

 

 

Cross, T. P., Vos, E. D., & Whitcomb, D. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse:  Which cases are accepted? Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(8), 663-677.

 

[WW]

 

 

Cullen, B. J., Smith, P. H., Funk, J. B., & Haaf, R. A. (2000). A matched cohort comparison of a criminal justice system's response to child sexual abuse:  A profile of perpetrators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(4), 569-577.

 

This study examined the differenced between perpetrator groups of child sexual abuse (CSA) and felony level non-sexual crimes over a 5-year period within the same district, and the same prosecutor's office.  Areas of comparison were felon characteristics, prosecutorial discretion (plea bargaining), and sentencing differences.

 

44% of the CSA group was charged with a Felony 1 (F-1, the most severe), which includes Rape and Aggravated Felonious Sexual Penetration, whereas 55% were charged with a Felony 3 crime (F-3, less severe), which includes Sexual Battery, Corruption of a Minor, and Gross Sexual Imposition, and only 1% was charged with Misdemeanor (M-3, Sexual Imposition).  The Misdemeanor was dropped from the study.  The same amount of cases was randomly chosen from the Non-CSA crimes to match the number of F-1 (23, Aggravated Burglary, Attempted Murder, Kidnapping) and F-3 (31, Grand Theft, Aggravated Trafficking in Drugs) cases.  CSA victims consisted primarily of European American females with an average age of 11.13 when the prosecutor accepted the case.   Approximately 39% of the abuse was intrafamilial, 60% extrafamilial.  Boyfriends were included in extrafamilial. There was only one charged abuser in 99% of the cases.   42% of the reported abuse cases stated the abuse occurred only one time, with reported abuse occurring more than 10 times in only 6% of the cases. [MS]

 

 

Davidson, H. A. (1997). The courts and child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer & R. S. Kempe (Eds.), Battered Child (5 ed., pp. 482-499).

 

 

Davis, N. S., & Wells, S. J. (1998). Justice system processing of child abuse and neglect cases, Legal intervention in family violence:  Research findings and policy implications. (pp. 15-17): National Institute of Justice.

 

 

Dible, D. A., & Teske, R. H. C. (1993). An analysis of the prosecutory effects of a child sexual abuse victim-witness program. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 79-85.

 

This study assessed the effects of a specialized victim-witness unit for child sexual abuse cases.  This case study included all child sexual abuse cases prosecuted by the District Attorney's office of Collin County, Texas from 1983 through 1989.  The 352 cases were divided into two categories: those prosecuted before or after August 17, 1985 when Texas established a victim-witness assistance program.  The program was created to provide support services for victims and their families throughout the stages of the criminal justice system.  The assessment of the program focused on prosecution and sentencing implications.  Subsequent to the introduction of the victim-witness program, guilty verdicts at trials increased from 38% to 72%, there was an increase in the seriousness of the offenses prosecuted, prison sentences almost doubled from 25% to 48%, the average length of prison sentences for guilty pleas resulting in prison sentences increased from 9.24 years to 16.48 years, and the average length of sentences for both probation and prison increased.

 

Because there were no control groups and only one agency was included, the implications of the results are limited.  However, the results indicate that the implementation of a victim-witness program has the potential to enhance prosecution and sentencing of child sexual abuse cases. [WW]

 

 

Finkelhor, D. (1983). Removing the child- prosecuting the offender in cases of sexual abuse: Evidence from the National Reporting System for Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 195-205.

 

 

Fridell, L. A. (1991). Intrafamilial child sexual abuse treatment:  Prosecution following expulsion. Child abuse and neglect, 15, 587-592.

 

 

Graves, P. A., & Sgroi, S. M. (1982). Law enforcement and child sexual abuse. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.), handbook of clinical intervention in child sexual abuse (pp. 309-333). Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

 

 

Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice:  The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York: The Free Press.

 

 

Harshbarger, S. (1987). Prosecution is an appropriate response in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 108-112.

 

[MS]

 

 

Hebert, P. J. (1987). Sexual abuse of children by professionals:  A case study in seeking criminal prosecution and civil damages. Response, 10(1), 18-20.

 

[M.E.]

 

 

Knepper, P. E., & Barton, S. M. (1997). The effect of courtroom dynamics on child maltreatment proceedings. Social Service Review, 71(2), 288-308.

 

 

Levesque, R. J. R. (1995). Prosecuting sex crimes against children: Time for "outrageous" proposals? Law & Psychology Review, 19, 59-91.

 

The authors of this article outline the failures of child welfare to successfully provide services to maltreated children and their families.  A lack of funding for services, an over-emphasis on foster care, limited resources, and a lack of investment in treatment by families are discussed as issues limiting the success of service-provision to this population.  A focus on help-seeking and service utilization research is recommended as offering important potential implications for improving service delivery.  Specifically, the authors suggest that there needs to be more research examining needs for services from families' perspective, more research on informal help-seeking by families, and longitudinal research looking at ways in which social networks of high-risk families encourage or discourage formal help-seeking. [TC]

 

 

Long, G. F. (1988). Legal issues in child sexual abuse: Criminal cases and neglect and dependency cases. In L. E. Auerbach (Ed.), Handbook on sexual abuse of children: assessment and treatment issues (pp. 137-151). New York: Springer.

 

 

MacMurray, B. K. (1989). Criminal determination for child sexual abuse:  Prosecutor case-screening judgments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4(2), 233-244.

 

 

Martone, M., Jaudes, P. K., & Cavins, M. (1996). Criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(5), 457-464.

 

 

Melton, G., Goodman, G. S., Kalichman, S. C., Levine, M., Saywitz, K. J., & Koocher, G. P. (1995). Empirical research on child maltreatment and the law. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 47-77.

 

 

National Institute of Justice, & American Bar Association. (1998). Legal interventions in family violence:  Research findings and policy implications (Research Report NCJ 171666). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

 

 

Newberger, E. H. (1987). Prosecution:  A problematic approach to child abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 112-117.

 

[MS]

 

 

Peters, J. M., Dinsmore, J., & Toth, P. (1989). Why prosecute child abuse? South Dakota Law Review, 34, 649-659.

 

[MS]

 

 

 

Rogers, C. M. (1982). Child sexual abuse and the courts:  Preliminary findings. Social Work and Human Sexuality, 1(1), 145-153.

 

 

Sandberg, D. N. (1987). Child sexual abuse:  To prosecute or not? New Hampshire Bar Journal, 29(1), 15-27.

 

[MS]

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1990). The adjudication of child sexual abuse cases, Victims of Crime.  Problems, Policies, and Programs (Vol. 25, pp. 104-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1995). Prosecuting child physical abuse cases:  A case study in San Diego (Research in Brief NCJ 152978). San Diego: NIJ.

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Elstein, S. G. (1993). The prosecution of child sexual and physical abuse cases (Final Report ). Washington, D.C.: The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Goretsky, S. R. The prosecution of child sexual abuse cases:  Part I. ABA Juvenile and Child Welfare Law Reporter, 11, 78-80.

 

 

Smith, B. E., & Goretsky, S. R. The prosecution of child sexual abuse cases:  Part II. ABA Juvenile and Child Welfare Law Reporter, 11, 94-96.

 

 

Smith, J. C., Runyan, D. K., & Fredrickson, D. D. (1994). The Little Rascals' day care center case:  A perspective on medical testimony in a prominent public trial. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 3(2), 89-97.

 

 

Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1992). Predictors of legal intervention in child maltreatment cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 807-821.

 

This study examined the extent and nature of legal intervention in substantiated intrafamilial child abuse and neglect cases (N=833) reported in Denver, CO, Los Angeles, CA, Newcastle, DE Counties in 1985-1986.  Legal intervention (dependency and criminal filings) was found to be rare, while treatment plan development and child placement out of the home were common.  Of the cases with legal intervention, many proceeded to trial, plea bargaining, and conviction.  Criminal filings were more likely to result from cases involving female victims 7-12 years old, a perpetrator of an ethnic minority or relationship other than parental, severe maltreatment, and sexual abuse.  Dependency filing resulted more frequently from severe and frequent maltreatment, sexual abuse, and abandonment. [LJ]

 

 

Watkins, S. A. (1990). The double victim:  The sexually abused child and the judicial system. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 7(1), 29-43.

 

This article gives a historical perspective on child sexual abuse to illustrate that child sexual abuse is not a new social problem.  For example, the earliest English rape law appeared in 1576.  Although it is difficult to determine the first sexual abuse case in the American judicial system, a number of criminal cases involving child abuse existed in the mid 1600s.  The 1874 New York case of Mary Ellen Wilson has been recognized as beginning the child protection movement in the United States.  The New York society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded in 1874 and emphasized the prosecution of parents and the removal of children from abusive homes.  In 1899, the juvenile court was created under the English law that justified state intervention to act in place of the parent.  Early advocates of the juvenile court wanted the court to look more like a family room than an adult criminal courtroom.  By 1927 all but 2 states had a juvenile court.  However, the juvenile court had to handle a wide range of problems and was not prepared to deal with the wide range of child abuse problems.  In the mid 1960s all fifty states introduced some type of child abuse reporting statutes.  In 1988 the Supreme Court in Coy v Iowa decided that using a screen in the courtroom violated the defendant's constitutional right to face-to-face confrontation.

 

Even though child abuse is both a criminal and civil offense, the decision to prosecute is complex and differs in every community.  Another difficult issue is that our constitutional rights are more aligned with the defendant rather than the victim witness.  Protective service workers' primary concern is reducing the trauma for the child.  Approaches for reducing trauma have included establishing interdisciplinary teams, coordinating juvenile and criminal court proceedings, providing a special advocate for the child in court, limiting the number of interviews, having special sexual abuse prosecution teams, methods to avoid a child's testimony at grand jury and preliminary hearings, and developing alternatives in a child's testimony in open court.  [WW]

 

 

Whitcomb, D., & Hardin, M. (1996). Coordinating criminal and juvenile court proceedings in child maltreatment cases. National Institute of Justice Research Preview, 1-3.

 

This article summarizes a National Institute of Justice-funded study conducted by Education Development Center, Inc. and the American Bar Association's Center on Children and the Law.  The purpose of the study was to examine the philosophical difference of emphasis between treatment in juvenile court and punishment in criminal court.  A nationally representative sample of 103 criminal prosecutors and 59 attorneys who represent child protection agencies in the juvenile court were interviewed.  The study found that although many child protection and law enforcement agencies work well together during the investigation process, attorneys in criminal and juvenile courts have not achieved a similar level of cooperation.    Prosecutors responded that 60% of their child maltreatment cases were concurrently involved in juvenile court proceeding, while child protection attorneys estimated that 13% of their caseloads were involved in criminal courts.  Approximately half of the attorneys replied that dual-court cases proceed independently, 1/5 of the prosecutors could not name the individual or agency responsible for representing the child protection agency in juvenile court, and several respondents felt that attempts to coordinate would not be effective because of different missions of criminal and juvenile courts.  Site visits were conducted with four jurisdictions that expressed concern about coordination.  Policy implications include delineating the nature of information that may be shared between the courts and under what circumstances and including child protection attorneys on existing multidisciplinary teams.  Greater cooperation is needed in order to protect children from harm. [WW]

 

 

Whitcomb, D., Runyan, D., DeVos, E., Hunter, W., Cross, T., Everson, M., Peeler, N., & Porter, C. (1992). When the victim is a child. (2 ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

 

 

Wulkan, D., & Bulkley, J. (198?). General survey findings relating to prosecutorial practices and policies. In J. Bulkely (Ed.), Innovations in the prosecution of child sexual abuse (pp. 1-8). Washington D.C.: American Bar Association.

 

Top of the Document

Effects on Children

 

Berliner, L., & Conte, J. R. (1995). The effects of disclosure and intervention on sexually abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(3), 371-384.

 

This study was a retrospective examination of the impact of disclosure and subsequent interventions for sexual abuse victims.  Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from 82 sexual abuse victims and their families about their experiences with different post-disclosure interventions.  Having contact with a greater number of professionals following disclosure was related to greater negative impact of the abuse.  Testifying in court had no relationship to impact.  Qualitative data revealed that most children had positive associations to system interventions, particularly when they felt that they had been treated in a respectful and caring manner. [LJ]

 

 

Bishop, S. J., Murphy, J. M., Jellinek, M. S., Quinn, S. D., & Poitrast, J. F. G. (1992). Protecting seriously mistreated children: Time delays in a court sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 465-474.

 

[TC]

 

 

Dezwirek-Sas, L. (1992). Empowering child witnesses for sexual abuse prosecution. In H. F. Dent, R. (Ed.), Children as Witnesses (pp. 181-199). Chichester, West: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Fleiss, J. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Dubro, A. F. (1986). The logistic regression analysis of psychiatric data. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 20(3), 145-209.

 

 

Henry, J. (1997). System intervention trauma to child sexual abuse victims following disclosure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 499-512.

 

This study looked retrospectively at the effects of post-disclosure interventions on victims of sexual abuse.  Ninety children participated from 3 communities with varying degrees of inter-agency coordination.  Thirty children overall were required to testify in either juvenile or criminal court.   Results indicated that higher trauma scores, as measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist, were related to an increased number of interviews, even when other aspects of the abuse such as seriousness were controlled for.  Lower trauma scores were related to the presence of a trusted professional.  No relationship was found between trauma and testifying, removal from the home, type of court, disposition of case, and medical exams.  Seventy-two percent of children recalled their experiences with agency intervention as positive. 

 

Although this study offers important information on the overall relationship between child trauma and different investigation experiences, comparisons between the communities were more difficult to interpret.  Despite unspecified differences in coordination of investigations between communities, no differences were found on child trauma scores.  However, the small sample size and the retrospective design of the study reduce the power of the study and therefore limit the ability to detect such differences. [LJ]

 

 

Jellinek, M. S., Little, M., Benedict, K., Murphy, J. M., Pagano, M., Poitrast, F., & Quinn, D. (1995). Placement outcomes of 206 severely maltreated children in the Boston juvenile court system:  A 7.5-year follow-up study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(9), 1051-1064.

 

 

Jellinek, M. S., Murphy, J. M., Poitrast, F., Quinn, D., Bishop, S. J., & Goshko, M. (1992). Serious child maltreatment in Massachusetts:  The course of 206 children through the courts. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16(2), 179-185.

 

This study followed 206 severely abused and/or neglected children involved in care and protection petitions through the Boston Juvenile Court for 4 years.  The majority of the parents of these children were found to suffer from psychiatric disorders (84%) and poverty (66.7%), and 81% had previously been involved with the Department of Social Services.  Parental compliance with services ordered by the court was the strongest predictor of judicial decisions to permanently remove the child from or return the child to parental custody.  Twenty-nine percent of the children returned to their parents were victims of subsequent maltreatment within the 3-year follow-up period.  The authors' conclusion is that children are not well served by the current legal and social service systems. [EC]

 

 

Lipovsky, J. A. (1994). The impact of court on children:  Research findings and practical recommendations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(2), 238-257.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Lipovsky, J. A., Tidwell, R., Crisp, J., Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B. E., & Dawson, V. L. (1992). Child witnesses in criminal court -- Descriptive information from three southern states. Law and Human Behavior, 16(6), 635-650.

 

 

Mahady-Smith, C. M. (1985). The young victim as witness for the prosecution:  Another form of abuse? Dickinson Law Review, 89(3), 721-749.

 

 

Oates, R. K., Lynch, D. L., Stern, A. E., O'Toole, B. I., & Cooney, G. (1995). The criminal justice system and the sexually abused child:  Help or hindrance? The Medical Journal of Australia, 162(6), 126-130.

 

This study used a prospective design to examine the impact of the criminal justice system on sexual abuse victims (N = 59).  Parent interviews were conducted and data was collected on child self-esteem, depression, and behavior problems.  Thirty-three cases were committed for trial or sentencing and 8 children testified in court.  Although the majority of parents described their experiences with the criminal justice system as unsatisfying and felt it was overly stressful for the children, no relationship was found between testifying and child distress measures.  Although sample size limits the power of the study, the findings suggest that the impact of the criminal justice system might be transient and less important than other variables in affecting child victims' well being. [LJ]

 

 

Runyan, D. K., Everson, M. D., Edelsohn, G. A., Hunter, W. M., & Coulter, M. L. (1988). Impact of legal intervention on sexually abused children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 113(4), 647-653.

 

This prospective study examined the emotional impact of involvement in criminal and juvenile courts for victims of sexual abuse.  A cohort of seventy-five victims was followed for 5 months.  Anxiety and distress were measured at intake and at 5-months using the Child Assessment Scale (CAS) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).  Results indicated that children involved in the criminal court system whose case was still pending after 5 months improved less than those whose case was resolved or who were not involved in criminal court at all.  Children who testified in juvenile court improved more than all other victims.  The authors concluded that although the sample was small, the main findings suggest that lengthier cases impede healing processes and testifying in juvenile court is not harmful and is possibly a healing experience for sexual abuse victims. [LJ]

 

 

Runyan, D. K., Hunter, W. M., Everson, M. D., Whitcomb, D., & DeVos, E. (1994). The intervention stressors inventory:  A measure of the stress of intervention for sexually abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(4), 319-329.

 

This article describes the development and validation of the Intervention Stressors Inventory (ISI), a new scale to measure the level of stress sexually abused children experience as a result of societal intervention.  The ISI was used to quantify the number of stressful events such as interview with law enforcer, medical exam, court testimony, and cross-examination.  Estimates of the relative stress of these interventions were obtained from 98 professionals.  After receiving the professional ratings, standard stress level weights for each event were calculated using geometric means of the ratings.  The validity of the ISI was assessed by interviewing 254 sexually abused children and their parents about their intervention experience in four jurisdictions across the country.

 

Early results suggest that this could be a useful tool.  Total intervention scores were higher for adolescents than for younger children.  Intervention scores did not differ for children who experienced vaginal or anal penetration and those who did not.  However, higher intervention scores were accompanied when victimization included physical force or threat of force.  Intervention varied by offender's relationship to the victim.  Extrafamilial cases had significantly higher adjudication and testimony scores, while intrafamilial victims had more protective service intervention.  A weakness of this study was the low return rate by professionals rating the inventory, with 98 of 316 professionals responding.  It is not clear how the professionals who responded differed from those who did not.  Another limitation is that the sample of adult experts rating the stress-inducing events may have had different perceptions about the stress than the children experiencing the events.  [WW]

 

 

Sas, L. Sex offenders and their victims- empowering children for abuse litigation:  New data . Oakville, Ontario: Child Witness Project, London Family Court Clinic.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Sas, L. (1997). Sexually abused children as witnesses. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters (Eds.), Child abuse:  new directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (pp. 248-267). London: Sage Publications.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Sas, L., Hurley, P., Hatch, A., Malia, S., & Dick, T. (1993). Three years after the verdict: A longitudinal study of the social and psychological adjustment of child witnesses referred to the child witness project. (Research FVDS #4887-06-91-026). London, Ontario: Family Violence Prevention Division of Health Canada under the Family Violence Initiative.

 

 

Sas, L. D., Wolfe, D. A., & Gowdey, K. (1996). Children and the courts in Canada. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(2), 338-357.

 

 

Smith, B. E., Elstein, S. G., Laszlo, A. T., Akimoto, M. C., Ayres, M. B., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Children on hold: Improving the response to children whose parents are arrested and incarcerated (Final ). Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law.

 

 

Smith, S. B. (1985). Children's story:  Sexually molested children in criminal court. (New Revised ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Launch Press.

 

 

Tedesco, J. F., & Schnell, S. V. (1987). Children's reaction to sex abuse investigation and litigation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 267-272.

 

This study was one of the first empirical examinations of the experiences of child abuse victims in the criminal justice system.  Questionnaires were returned from 48 child victims who testified in a criminal trial.  These children had been interviewed from 1 to 40 times by, most typically, three different interviewers.  Nine children had been required to testify in front of the abuser in a court trial.  Forty-eight percent of the sample rated their investigation experiences as helpful, 19% as harmful, 19% as both and 2% as neither.  A greater number of interviewers and testifying in front of the abuser were related to perceiving the experience as more harmful.  Although the size and representativeness of the sample limit generalizability of the findings, the research offers preliminary evidence that the prosecutory experience is not always perceived as a negative one by victims. [LJ]

 

 

Weiss, E. H., & Berg, R. F. (1982). Child victims of sexual assault:  Impact of court procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21(5), 513-518.

 

The article is one of the earlier published descriptions of professional concern about the impact of the court system on child victims of abuse.  The authors' concerns arose from their experiences with child abuse victims in Washington D.C.  The article summarizes of the effects of sexual victimization on children, describes the procedures of the three courts child victims often become involved with (criminal, delinquency, and family), and outlines the ways in which the procedures can be insensitive to children's needs and possibly exacerbate the victims' trauma and stress reactions.  The authors use examples from clinical cases to illustrate their points and follow up with recommendations for mental health workers and the court system.  Despite the age of the article, it offers a useful introduction to the concerns professionals have about the impact of court procedures on child victim witnesses. [LJ]

 

 

Whitcomb, D., Goodman, G. S., Runyan, D. K., & Hoak, S. (1994). The emotional effects of testifying on sexually abused children (NIJ:  Research in Brief NCJ 146414). Washington, D. C.: Department of Justice.

 

This research brief published by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) summarizes findings from three of the largest studies on the effects of testifying on child victims.  Results are summarized from:  1) a study by Desmond Runyan and his colleagues based in North Carolina; 2) a study by Gail Goodman and her colleagues based in Denver, Colorado; and 3) a multi-site research project by Debra Whitcomb and her colleagues funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). All three studies found that children were highly anxious at intake, but, for the most part, improved greatly over time regardless of their experiences in court.

 

 Findings on the specific effects of testifying were mixed.  Goodman, et al. found negative effects for child witnesses at a seven-month follow-up.  Runyan, et al., on the other hand, found testifiers in juvenile court improved more than non-testifiers at a 5-month follow-up.  At longer follow-up periods none of the studies found significant differences between child victims who testified and those who did not.  Other findings included the importance of maternal support in children's emotional well-being and the negative impact of multiple interviews or testimony and delays in the court process on children. [LJ]

 

Top of the Document

Investigation and Investigative Agencies

 

Chapman, J. R., & Smith, B. (1987). Response of social service and criminal justice agencies to child sexual abuse complaints. Response, 10(3), 7-13.

 

This research examined the actions taken by social service and criminal justice agencies in all founded child sexual abuse cases in two counties.  The sample was a random sample survey of 183 closed social service cases and 205 closed police cases.  Of the social service cases, 21% were closed in less than 1 month and about 80% were closed in 12 months or less.  Child welfare agencies took action in only 41% of the founded cases, which means that 59% of the founded cases received neither juvenile court action nor service agreements through social services.  When action was taken, the most frequent action taken was temporary removal of child from home (71% of cases).  Other actions were child placed in foster care (41%), child placed with family, friend, others (44%), child welfare agency service given protective supervision of child (60%), and abuser removed from home (62%).  Counseling was ordered for 44% of the children in child welfare founded complaints.  Counseling was order for 56% of the abusers, 65% through court mandate and 35% through informal agreements.  Response of the justice system indicated that the abuser was arrested 51% of the time.  Convicted abusers were incarcerated in 60% of the cases, with 59% of the sentences involving 12 months or less. Less than half of the cases (41%) resulted in civil actions or informal service agreements.  Therefore, 59% received neither juvenile court action nor service agreements. Because this study examined case processing in two sites, it is not known whether this research represents the national response of social service and criminal justice agencies. [WW]

 

 

Dam, C. V., Halliday, L., & Bates, C. (1985). The occurrence of sexual abuse in a small community. Canadian Journal of Community, 4(1), 105-111.

 

 

Mrazek, P. J., Lynch, M. A., & Bentovim, A. (1983). Sexual abuse of children in the United Kingdom. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 147-153.

 

 

Small, M. A., & Wanke, K. L. (1994). State responses to child maltreatment, Young Victims, Young Offenders (pp. 11-26). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press, Inc.

 

 

Stevens, G., Fischer, D. G., & Berg, L. (1992). Review and monitoring of child sexual abuse cases in selected sites in Saskatchewan:  Studies on the sexual abuse of children in Canada: Department of Justice, Canada.

 

 

Stroud, D. D., Martens, S. L., & Barker, J. (2000). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse:  A comparison of cases referred to the prosecutor to those not referred. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(5), 689-700.

 

[TC]

 

 

Trute, B., Adkins, E., & MacDonald, G. (1996). Professional attitudes regarding treatment and punishment of incest: Comparing police, child welfare, and community mental health. Journal of Family Violence, 11(3), 237-249.

 

This study the differences in attitudes between the 3 primary agencies involved with intrafamilial child sexual abuse: police, child welfare and community mental health.  In a large Canadian farming community, personnel were sampled from 3 agencies and given 3 previously developed vignettes with 3 Likert-type items each relating to treatment and punishment issues.  The consistent themes of the tests were view of perpetrator as mentally ill rather than criminal, view that mother and daughter were victims rather than guilty participants, and that court mandated treatment would benefit the incest situation.  Police were significantly more likely to consider the offending parent as criminal and to find the mother complicit.  It was noted that the police had more male subjects.  Additionally, the other services maintained older employees. [MS]

 

 

Conte, J. R. (1984). The justice system and sexual abuse of children. Social Service Review, 556-567.

 

 

DeFrancis, V. (1969). Protecting the child victim of sex crimes committed by adults (Final Report Child Welfare Research Grant R-222). Denver, CO: The American Humane Association Children's Division.

 

 

DeJong, A. R., & Rose, M. (1991). Legal proof of child sexual abuse in the absence of physical evidence. Pediatrics, 88(3), 506-511.

 

[TC]

 

 

Dolan, K. J. (1984). Evaluation of outcomes for reported cases of child sexual abuse in Texas. Victimology:  An International Journal, 9(3-4), 383-397.

 

 

Ells, M. (2000, March). Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse (Originally Printed November 1998) [On-Line]. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Available: www.ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/portable_guides/forming/forward.html [2001, March 23].

 

 

Meddin, B., & Hansen, I. (1985). The services provided during a child abuse and/or neglect case investigation and the barriers that exist to service provision. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 175-182.

 

 

Nicholas-Carnes, C., Nelson-Gardell, D., & Wilson, C. (1999). Addressing challenges and controversies in child sexual abuse interviewing:  The forensic evaluation protocol and research project. In K. C. Faller (Ed.), Maltreatment in early childhood:  Tools for research-based intervention (pp. 83-103). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press.

 

[M.E.]

 

 

White, S., & Quinn, K. M. (1988). Investigatory independence in child sexual abuse evaluations:  Conceptual considerations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 16(3), 269-278.

 

 

Wood, J. M., & Garven, S. (2000). How sexual abuse interviews go astray:  Implications for prosecutors, police, and child protection services. Child Maltreatment, 5(2), 109-129.

 

[M.E.]

 

Top of the Document

Medical Evaluation

 

Baum, E., Grodin, M. A., Alpert, J. J., & Glantz, L. (1987). Child sexual abuse, criminal justice, and the pediatrician. Pediatrics, 79(3), 437-439.

 

[WW]

 

 

DeJong, A. R. (1998). Impact of child sexual abuse medical examinations on the dependency and criminal systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(6), 645-652.

 

This article reviews research about the role and context of child sexual abuse medical examinations as well as the sociolegal impact of medical examinations.  The review indicates that criminal prosecution for sexual abuse is more common than for other forms of abuse and neglect, the prosecutor's decision to pursue criminal charges is based on a number of factors (such as strength of evidence, likelihood of conviction, and seriousness of abuse).  About half of all child sexual abuse cases referred for prosecution are accepted and most result in guilty pleas and convictions.  The existence of specific physical findings doesn't seem to increase the likelihood of confession or conviction.  The review indicates that there is little data about the process or outcome of child sexual abuse cases in juvenile or dependency court.  The author concludes that more information is needed about role the medical examination plays in the process and outcome of child sexual abuse cases.  Areas of research priorities focus on interviewing and obtaining histories from children, demystifying the process how medical examinations influence the child protection process, and describing cases which are not accepted for prosecution. [WW]

 

 

Palusci, V. J., Cox, E. O., Cyrus, T. A., Heartwell, S. W., Vandervort, F. E., & Pott, E. S. (1999). Medical assessment and legal outcome in child sexual abuse. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 388-391.

 

 

Baum, E., Grodin, M. A., Alpert, J. J., & Glantz, L. (1987). Child sexual abuse, criminal justice, and the pediatrician. Pediatrics, 79(3), 437-439.

 

[WW]

 

 

DeJong, A. R. (1998). Impact of child sexual abuse medical examinations on the dependency and criminal systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(6), 645-652.

 

This article reviews research about the role and context of child sexual abuse medical examinations as well as the sociolegal impact of medical examinations.  The review indicates that criminal prosecution for sexual abuse is more common than for other forms of abuse and neglect, the prosecutor's decision to pursue criminal charges is based on a number of factors (such as strength of evidence, likelihood of conviction, and seriousness of abuse).  About half of all child sexual abuse cases referred for prosecution are accepted and most result in guilty pleas and convictions.  The existence of specific physical findings doesn't seem to increase the likelihood of confession or conviction.  The review indicates that there is little data about the process or outcome of child sexual abuse cases in juvenile or dependency court.  The author concludes that more information is needed about role the medical examination plays in the process and outcome of child sexual abuse cases.  Areas of research priorities focus on interviewing and obtaining histories from children, demystifying the process how medical examinations influence the child protection process, and describing cases which are not accepted for prosecution. [WW]

 

 

Palusci, V. J., Cox, E. O., Cyrus, T. A., Heartwell, S. W., Vandervort, F. E., & Pott, E. S. (1999). Medical assessment and legal outcome in child sexual abuse. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 388-391.

 

Top of the Document

Multidisciplinary Teams and Children’s Advocacy Centers

 

Hochstadt, N. J., & Harwicke, N. J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach?  A follow up study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 365-372.

 

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect program in Chicago based on service delivery.  Service delivery was measured by the number of recommendations that were followed/obtained by the child's CPS worker one year following discharge.  The sample included 180 children who had been reported to DCFS as suspected of being abused or neglected.  Two independent sources, caseworker and parent, were required to corroborate whether services were obtained.  Recommended services obtained one year after evaluation ranged from returning home (100%), foster care (92%), visiting nurse (76%), and additional medical assessment (66%).  Outpatient psychological service recommendations were not followed as frequently as other service recommendations.  For example, family psychotherapy was obtained 44% of the times recommended, individual psychotherapy was obtained 35% of the time, and additional psychological/psychiatric assessments were obtained 29% of the time.  The type of abuse/neglect did not influence the number of services obtained, but did influence the type of service recommended, especially for failure to thrive cases.

 

Although this study indicates that a multidisciplinary team can have a positive effect on the delivery of services, the study would have been strengthened by using a control group.  This would enhance the ability of concluding that it was the multidisciplinary team that made a difference in service delivery.  The results do indicate that the multidisciplinary team performs functions that increase the probability of service acquisition such as providing "clout" to dislodge services, reducing the fragmentation and duplication of efforts and providing case coordination. [WW]

 

 

Beauchamp, B. (2001). Belief in the future is based upon belief in the present:  A discussion about program evaluation and children's advocacy centers. Paper presented at The 17th National Symposium on Child Abuse, Huntsville, AL.

 

 

Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children.  Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(1), 71-84.

 

This study examines the role of a consulting forensic team approach to criminal child abuse cases.  The forensic team was created in 1985 to improve criminal prosecutions and to provide additional expertise to child abuse cases.  Professionals (n=18) who had referred cases for consultative services were interviewed to evaluate the service. In other words, consumers of the service were interviewed rather than providers of the service as in other studies.  All respondents agreed that the team provided missing expertise.  A majority of respondents (83%) agreed that the team alleviated ambiguities in the case, made possible resolution of cases that might otherwise remain unresolved (67%), and made possible progress of cases that would otherwise be delayed (56%).  The general consensus to the open ended discussion about the overall value of the team was that the team was helpful, but not critical.  However, in one-third of the cases, the respondents volunteered that it was because of the team that an appropriate result was reached.  Not all results were positive.  The team did not resolve all of the cases, and the team's role and ability to resolve disputes was unclear.  Limitations of the study were the small sample size and lack of a comparison group.  However, an overwhelming majority agreed that the team provided moral support and improved confidence that the case was being managed correctly. [WW]

 

 

Faller, K. C., & Henry, J. (2000). Child sexual abuse:  A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1215-1225.

 

This exploratory study examined processes and outcomes for 323 criminal court cases (1988-1998) in a relatively small Midwestern United States community.  The community developed a case management plan in 1985 with the following special components, among others:

 

·           Coordination between CPS and law enforcement

·           Videotapes of child interviews are made whenever possible and used in the interrogation of suspects

·           Non-confessing suspects are offered polygraph examinations

 

The % of cases with CPS involvement declined dramatically over the study period, due, the authors suggest, to increasing caseloads and a consequent limitation on CPS involvement in non-caretaker cases.   73% of child interviews were videotaped.  38% of offenders were polygraphed, with the polygrapher diagnosing deception in 63% of the polygraphs and the offender confessing in 9% of polygraphs.  64% of offenders confessed during the investigation and 76% pleaded to some form of criminal sexual conduct in the target case or another.  69% of cases charged, with the most common reason for not charging being passing the polygraph.  Only 15 cases (5%) went to trial, with 6 convictions.  76% of offenders received some sort of sentence.  Less than 10% of children had to be placed outsider the home.  The authors report that the rates of charging, confession, plea and child placement compare favorably to other studies.  The confession rate is especially notable because it referred exclusively to sex crimes, and excluded bargaining to plead to a non-sexual crime.  Based in part on discussions with community professionals, the authors attribute the community's success to effective collaboration among agencies, although this conclusion must be tentative without more process data and a comparison group. [TC]

 

 

Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(5), 401-421.

 

This study assesses the effects of organizational variables such as organizational climate and interorganizational relationships on service quality (comprehensiveness, continuity, caseworker availability, and responsiveness) and outcomes.  A quasi-experimental longitudinal design was used.  Qualitative and quantitative data over a 3-year period was collected by 32 public children's services offices located in 12 pilot counties and 12 matched control counties.  The 250 children in the study had been placed in state custody for at least 1 year by juvenile and family court judges for neglect, abuse, status offenses, or delinquent behavior.  A goal of the pilot project was to improve service coordination (authorization, accountability, and monitoring procedures) in order to enhance the quality and outcomes of services provided to children.  Linear structural equation analysis was used to examine the relationships between organizational climate and service outcomes.  Improvements in psychosocial functioning were significantly greater for children served by offices with more positive climates (including low conflict, cooperation, role clarity, and personalization).  In contrast, interorganizational coordination had a negative effect on service quality and effect on outcomes. Teachers' descriptions of children's psychosocial functioning were found to be better indicators of outcomes than were parents' descriptions.  Findings suggest that service effectiveness is related more to organizational climate, the service provider attitudes that characterize a given service system, than to service system configurations. [WW]

 

 

Goldstein, J., & Griffin, E. (1993). The use of a physician-social worker team in the evaluation of sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(2), 85-93.

 

This study describes five years' experience establishing and developing a physician-social worker team for the evidentiary evaluation of child sexual abuse.  The center is located in an area of northern San Diego County.  The evaluation consists of a videotaped interview and a physical examination where the physician and social worker function as a unit.  Three benefits of a strong physician-social worker team were identified.  First, the partnership serves as a reminder than the child's history and physical examination are linked and provide more information together than alone.  Second, the team emphasizes and reinforces the healing aspects of this work by providing gradual transitions for children. The team enhances the family's security by providing a comprehensive and therapeutic evaluation. Third, the team provides an avenue for dialogue and support for the team members.  The authors conclude that a strong successful team is built on good communication and the availability of each partner.  [WW]

 

 

Jaudes, P. K., & Martone, M. (1992). Interdisciplinary evaluations of alleged sexual abuse cases. Pediatrics, 89(6), 1164-1168.

 

This article evaluates the Victim Sensitive Interviewing Program (VSIP) that was implemented to decrease the number of interviews endured by a child who allegedly had been sexually abused.  The VSIP provides a coordinated investigative interview, medical examination, and follow-up medical and counseling services to alleged child sexual abuse victims.  A retrospective chart review was performed on all children seen at a hospital-based center in Chicago.  Sexual abuse assessments from 1985 through 1986 (38) were classified as pre-VSIP and compared with VSIP evaluations from 1987 through 1988 (226).  There were a number of significant differences comparing assessments pre-VSIP and VSIP; 11% of pre-VSIP vs. 79% of VSIP had one interview, 24% of pre-VSIP vs. 88% of VSIP were interviewed by only one interviewer, 68% of pre-VSIP vs. 88% of VSIP were indicated cases of sexual abuse, 71% of pre-VSIP vs. 85% of VSIP identified the perpetrator, and 33% of pre-VSIP vs. 60% of VSIP pressed charges if the perpetrator was identified.   Because cases screened at this hospital-based center are likely to have a higher index of suspicion, more information is needed about cases not screened at the hospital.  The authors strongly recommended that interdisciplinary teams be formed to assess allegations of child sexual abuse. [WW]

 

 

Jensen, J. M., Jacobson, M., Unrau, Y., & Robinson, R. L. (1996). Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse:  An evaluation of the children's advocacy model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13(2), 139-156.

 

This article presents the results of an evaluation of three Children's Justice Centers (CJCs) in Utah.  The authors describe the CJCs and their use of the Child Advocacy Center (CAC) model in investigating child sexual abuse.  The CJCs offer a "homelike" environment for children, use multidisciplinary teams in interviews, and conduct weekly multidisciplinary case reviews.  Two hundred and ninety-four children seen at three Utah CJCs participated in the project.  Researchers collected data on abuse-related variables, children and parents' satisfaction with their experiences, team members' satisfaction with services provided, and legal case outcomes.  A brief pretest-posttest assessment of children's behaviors and emotions was conducted at intake and at a 3-month follow-up with 87 of the subjects.  Child problem behaviors had significantly decreased at the 3-month post-test.  Eighty-eight percent of the children felt "very good" to "a little good" about the interview with only 12% of children reporting that they felt "bad" or "very bad."  Team members' endorsed their satisfaction with the efficiency and effectiveness of the CJCs' services across all sites.  Parents' satisfaction with the CJCs' services were high at intake but decreased by the 3-month follow-up.  Although a control group would have increased the interpretability of the findings, the study nonetheless represents an important effort in an area where there is currently little research.  The lower rate of parent satisfaction at the 3-month follow-up is interesting and suggests further research is needed on efforts to meet the child and families post-investigation needs. [LJ]

 

 

Kaminer, B. B., Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1990). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect:  A national survey. In M. B. W. Sandra M. Stith, & Karen Rosen (Ed.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 549-567). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

[DL]

 

 

Kolbo, J. R., & Strong, E. (1997). Multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect:  A national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2(1), 61-72.

 

The purpose of this research was to examine trends in multidisciplinary team system design.  Interviews were conducted with individuals knowledgeable about this approach in all 50 states (92% were CPS staff).  Of the 50 states, 33 reported having statewide participation, 30 have implemented the multidisciplinary approach using legislative mandate, and 3 have used departmental regulation or directive.  Of the 17 states not requiring statewide participation, 11 have enacted statues encouraging the development of teams under specific conditions.  States identified the investigation of reported cases, treatment plans, and consultation as the most common functions.  Two-thirds of respondents reported one or more benefit, a majority referred to increased coordination and collaboration and broader and joint decision making process.  Challenges included confusion about leadership roles, ownership issues, and scrutiny of their work.  Although the most frequent strategy to deal with these challenges was training, only 30% of respondents reported their state providing ongoing training.    Results are compared with previous national surveys and described changes in the system design of multidisciplinary teams.  This study suggests a change in multidisciplinary team functions from advising and consulting to investigation and treatment plans.  This study also indicates that law enforcement and legal services have taken larger roles due in part because team activities are often determined by legislation.  Community education and monitoring of cases have become more prominent functions. [WW]

 

 

Krugman, R. D. (1990). Future challenges for child protection teams: Research, education, advocacy. In S. M. Stith, M. B. Williams, & K. Rosen (Eds.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 616-624). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

This article provides a brief overview of what is known about the different types of child abuse as well as unanswered questions.  An overview of the role of child protection teams is described.  Specific suggestions for dealing with difficult issues facing those working in the field of child abuse and neglect include the following; the need to recognize that complex problems do not have simple solutions, that multidisciplinary teams must help fix responsibility for efforts at the federal, state, and local levels, ongoing evaluation must be included in all programs, there needs to be regionalized networks, greater focus on prevention, an increase in training for all those involved in the multidisciplinary team, an increase in the number of treatment facilities, an increase in funding, an increase in political awareness and activity, and realistic expectations from those working in this field. [WW]

 

 

Pardess, E., Finzi, R., & Sever, J. (1993). Evaluating the best interests of the child:  A model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Medicine and Law, 12, 205-211.

 

This article describes a multidisciplinary teamwork model in conducting clinical evaluations of children and families and preparing expert testimony.  The overall procedure and goals of this model are described based on the team's experience evaluating over 60 cases involving child abuse and neglect over the past five years. The team consists of a clinical psychologist, a psychiatric social worker, and a child psychiatrist.  Teamwork can reduce the effects of personal biases, enhance validity and reliability, provide sharing and support, and enhance integration of theory, techniques, and examinations.  Recommendations include a separation of roles of expert witnesses and therapists, utilization of different diagnostic tools, understanding the value of examining the feasibility of recommendations with family members, and incorporating strategies to attain parent consent.  [WW]

 

 

Reichard, R. D. (1993). Dysfunctional families in dysfunctional systems?  Why child advocacy centers may not be enough. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 103-109.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Rogan, M. S. (1990). The multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. In M. B. W. Sandra M. Stith, & Karen Rosen (Ed.), Violence Hits Home:  Comprehensive Treatment Approaches to Domestic Violence (pp. 105-114). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

This article describes the history of the multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect.  In 1974 the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act created the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect to provide assistance to agencies and states.  States responded by identifying the need for coordinating services.  The multidisciplinary team approach was chosen as a solution to this problem.  Although models vary, purposes of this approach include providing a structured format for sharing professional knowledge, improving the quality of services to the family, supporting casework staff and other service providers, and helping resolve misunderstandings and misconceptions.  Other issues described in this article include team membership, the role of a team coordinator, confidentiality, case referral criteria, and evaluation.  A short scenario is illustrated to demonstrate a typical child sexual abuse team meeting.  This overview describes the multidisciplinary approach as enhancing service coordination, increasing communication among agencies, and enhancing professionals' insight from discussing cases. [WW]

 

 

Sheppard, D. I., & Zangrillo, P. A. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse. Public Welfare, 21-31.

 

[WW]

 

 

Skaff, L. F. (1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, LXVII(3), 217-230.

 

This article describes a nationwide review of the descriptive information on coordinating committees and explores factors associated with committee effectiveness.  The study tests two hypotheses.  First, committee participation will be greater when members are allowed equal power in group decisions or when the committee is perceived to be effective by potential group members.  Second, committee collaboration will be greater if one of the following exists; perceived equality of power among members, a sharable group goal, the committee operates in a neutral setting, the community supports the committee.  The dependent variables were committee participation and member collaboration.  A stratified random sampling procedure was used.  A total of 188 were reviewed and 24 coordinating committees were used to test the hypotheses.  Of all the independent variables testes, only perceived committee effectiveness was significantly related to committee participation.  Member collaboration was found to be significantly related to many factors.  When communities emphasized community wide goals versus individual agency concerns, collaboration was greater.  Equal member power and a neutral committee setting both increased the likelihood of collaboration.  One of the most essential benefits of coordinating committees was the opportunity to communicate directly and thus gain new services and legislation and increase community awareness.  Many committees were able to sustain prevention and treatment programs that would otherwise have been eliminated.  [WW]

 

 

Smith, B. E. (1989). The multidisciplinary team approach to investigating of out-of-home abuse cases. Response, 12(3), 10-12.

 

 

Sorenson, E. (1993). A rose by any name would smell as sweet:  Enhancing the functioning child advocacy center. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 111-113.

 

[LJ]

 

 

Tjaden, P. G., & Anhalt, J. (1994). The impact of joint law enforcement-child protective services investigations in child maltreatment cases. . Denver, CO: Center of Policy Research.

 

This study compared process and outcome of investigations in five communities that varied in the degree to which police and CPS investigations were conducted jointly.  The authors found that the term "joint investigation" was loosely defined, and operationally defined it as involving at least one contact between the two agency investigators during the CPS investigation or one conjoint interview sometime during the investigation process.  Joint investigations were more common with sexual abuse, with more serious abuse and with multiple forms of abuse.  They were more frequent when law enforcement was the first agency officially reporting the abuse, and in the context of emergency medical treatment for the victim.

 

In comparison to independent investigations, joint investigations had:

 

·           Shorter caseworker response times

·           Lengthier investigations

·           More contacts during the investigations

·           More frequent use of face-to-face interviews with persons involved in the case

·           More custody removals

·           More perpetrator departures from the home

·           More perpetrator confessions

·           More frequent victim corroboration

·           More substantiated reports

·           More dependency filings

·           More criminal prosecutions

·           More guilty pleas

 

Joint investigations did not have more repeat interviews than independent investigations.

 

The impressive list of differences between joint and independent investigations is difficult to interpret, however, because they could all plausibly be explained by the differences in the type of cases investigated jointly versus independently (e.g., in  seriousness and type of abuse).  Moreover, there is no way of ruling out the possibility that cases on which agencies decided to intervene more intensely were assigned to be jointly investigated.  The authors did not statistically control for possible confounds, nor did they address them in the text.

 

The more rigorous comparison of communities that differed on degree of joint versus independent investigations did not suggest an effect of cooperation.  Communities differed significantly on a number of process and outcome variables, but these differences were never related to the communities' rank on degree of police-social worker cooperation on investigations. [TC]

 

 

Williams, G. (1993). The expansion of advocacy center's role:  Too much?  Too soon? Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(4), 115-118.

 

[CA]

 

 

Top of the Document