The Boston Globe Gramm hits Forbes in negative ad war By Peter S. Canellos, Globe Staff, 12/15/95
Sen. Phil Gramm yesterday joined the first one-on-one negative ad war of the 1996 presidential campaign, unveiling his own attack ad to correct what he says are lies in an ad by publisher Steve Forbes. The Forbes ad said the Texas senator ``engineered'' a $100 billion tax increase as part of the unpopular 1990 budget deal. In fact, Gramm was part of the negotiating team for the budget deal, but he repudiated the final agreement and voted against it. Gramm's commercial suggests that just as ``Phil Gramm's campaign starts to roll,'' Forbes ``starts negative commercials. One problem: They're not true.'' Gramm, in an interview this week, said, ``I don't think simply because somebody has a lot of money to spend on ads they have the right to run an ad that is verifiably false.'' Gretchen Morgenson, Forbes' press secretary, said the Forbes ad, running in New Hampshire this week, is literally true: ``All our ad says is that Gramm negotiated, engineered - whatever word you want to use - the $100 billion tax hike. That's a fact. The fact that a month later he changed his mind doesn't change things. Are they denying that he was the engineer of that $100 billion tax increase?'' Both camps said that the negative ad war came about because their man is gaining in private polls; in fact, both lag far behind Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole of Kansas in all published polls. The Forbes campaign is running another negative ad, this one aimed at Dole. It attacks him for supporting an $18 million upgrade of the subway connecting Senate office buildings: ``Steve Forbes says no, it was wasteful spending,'' the ad proclaims. ``Bob Dole says yes. Bob Dole voted for a new subway to run three blocks from senators' offices to the Capitol.''