|
State of the University Address
September 11, 2001
Welcome to a new year at the University of New Hampshire. A new academic
year is always an exciting time for a university. I very much appreciate
your participation in this day of celebration at UNH.
Because I plan to move toward retirement next summer, today I want to
try to pull together many of the things we have talked together about
over the last five years: who we are, where we are headed, and what is
required to meet our highest goals.
There are many new members of UNH to welcome today. At the top of the
list are 2560 first-year students. They have been intensely engaged in
orientation activities and the first week of classes, learning what it
means to be part of UNH. In our freshman class we welcome 120 students
of color. That number compares to 65 in autumn 1998. This is our third
consecutive year of increasing diversity among our undergraduates, a firm
commitment at UNH.
The total student body this year numbers approximately 12,500 degree
seeking students. Of these 10,340 are undergraduates. In autumn 1994 we
enrolled 10,896 undergraduates so our undergraduate numbers this year
are about 550 fewer than fall 1994. Over the next few years our enrollment
plans anticipate a gradual return to the enrollment levels of 1994-95.
A big difference between then and now is the strong interest of upperclassmen
to live in campus residence halls. We have crowded the residence halls
again this year in an effort to accommodate as many as possible, but we
recognize the need for more on-campus housing. A new residence hall and
a new dining hall are under construction right outside our doors here.
We will go from my speech this afternoon directly outside for a celebration
of the construction. The new facilities will ease, but not fully solve,
the housing crunch. Please think positive when the noise, dirt, and inconvenience
become bothersome during the months ahead. We do need these new facilities.
OUR HERITAGE
The University of New Hampshire is a different kind of university than
most others. We were established in 1866 in response to the passing of
the federal Morrill Act. Many years before that, the record shows substantial
discussion, heavily influenced by the philosophies of Thomas Jefferson,
about what the new nation would require of higher education, the need
for an educated citizenry, a citizenry prepared to do the work of a democratic
society.
In 1856 Benjamin Thompson bequeathed his farm and much of his wealth
to the establishment of a college in New Hampshire that would provide
education in agriculture and the sciences. He used language similar to
what would appear in a bill proposed by Senator Justin Morrill from Vermont
and signed by President Lincoln in 1862. The bill established a network
of state colleges to "teach the practical arts together with the
liberal arts" and provide education "to the sons and daughters
of the working class." At that time the nation was at war to decide
if it could be a single nation. Perhaps only the GI Bill comparesat
the level of public policyin establishing the important link between
higher education and the democratic experiment.
These institutions would have special responsibilities to the states
in which they were located and would be funded initially by grants of
land from the federal government. Land grants were a common form of currency
for the federal government at that time. The nations railroads were
one beneficiary of federal land grants. Land grant universities were another.
The land grant universities are those that boldly undertake three missions
all at once: instruction, research, and public service. They combine these
missions to provide a rich learning environment for faculty and students.
They recognize that citizenship and civic responsibility are important
dimensions of education; that knowledge exists not only for its own sake
but for its application to human need; they play an essential role in
making education accessible to all who would benefit from it. Land grant
universities are a very American invention. There were no such universities
in Europe, and the land grants were a sharp departure from the private
institutions founded early in our countrys history primarily to
educate the clergy, the teachers, and the public officials for the next
generation. These universities would not be cloistered behind stone walls.
They would be integrally engaged with society.
OUR RECORD
We are very much in the debt of those who came before us and whose commitment
shaped a distinguished university for our work today. It is important
that we give no less than earlier generations and that we, too, leave
a positive mark on this institution and the world beyond.
As I thought about the opportunity to talk with you today, I looked back
to see what work at UNH attracted the attention of the media last year.
As we might expect, the press and television of New Hampshire gave considerable
attention to the University. They reported on the success of our engineering
students in the national Moon Buggy Race and in the MINI BAJA competition,
and on UNHs first high-tech spinout company with a business plan
developed by WSBE students. They noted the warm response of audiences
in England to the tour of the UNH Symphonic Orchestra and highlighted
the award winning play written by a UNH student and performed last summer
at the Kennedy Center in Washington.
Increasingly the work of our faculty and students has national and international
importance, and, as a consequence, is also featured in the national media.
Last year, there was an array of stories in newspapers and magazines like
The Washington Post, U S A Today, The Wall Street Journal, The Boston
Globe, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, U S News & World
Report, Business Week. The articles covered a great range of our academic
areas: venture capital networking; mapping the floor of oceans and inland
lakes; lobster population studies; child victimization on the internet;
marital and partner violence; effective disciplining of children; crass
humor in popular culture; depression in women; the destruction of the
Compton Gamma Ray Observatory; effects of forests on carbon dioxide density;
global warming and climate change; global water scarcity; meteor showers;
accuracy in polling data; three Gates Scholars at UNH; a faculty member
appointed to the Presidents Panel on Ocean Exploration; a Dean appointed
to the Presidents Commission on Ocean Policy. This national coverage
is a strong testament to the reputation of academic programs at UNH and
to the relevance of the work being done here.
Our faculty, with their students, continue to create new knowledge and
to connect existing knowledge in ways that provide new insights and new
applications. Their creative work appears, not just in the media, but
in scholarly journals or as novels, plays, poems, histories, and textbooks.
We expect that efforts now underway to create an organizational structure
for certain areas of the social and health sciences and their applications
will succeed in providing another strong institute at UNH to support the
work of faculty and students. It is within our departments, centers, institutes,
cooperative extension, and off-campus locations that the academic work
of the University takes place. In a very real sense, everything that happens
at the University is in support of that work. Those who moved tons of
snow last winter, who prepare and serve our meals, who process our research
proposals, who protect us against the Code Red worm, who keep the campus
safe and secure, all of these people make immeasurably important contributions
to the work of the University.
PRAGMATIC GOALS
When I arrived five years ago, I set pragmatic goals
I thought essential to strengthening the University. Id like to
talk a few minutes about our progress in the support areas. I have already
said a few words about enrollment planning and enrollment levels: we are
moving to restore the enrollment levels of 1994-95 with a somewhat different
undergraduate/graduate ratio, and with greater diversity in the student
community.
Change the budgeting processes. We needed
to make basic changes in our financial management and budget processes
in order to address budget deficits and to guarantee that the University
operates at every point as an efficient, cost-effective business. The
goal is to get the most possible out of every dollar available to us.
Under the administrative redesign and the new budget model, which we call
RCM, we have delegated considerable financial authority and accountability
to the 20 large units of the University, made our budgetary policies more
flexible, and developed rules for resource allocation that cause resources
to rise and fall with activity levels. Last year was the first year that
all parts came together and the model could be implemented. We see several
positive indicators: units are doing substantially more long-term planning
and are accumulating reserves for later major investments, curriculum
redesign is taking place in several areas, there is greater attention
to revenue generation and cost containment, and our financial conditionalthough
very tightis stable. The number of glitches has been few. We get
at least an A- for our first year with RCM. Change to a new budget model
is predictably difficult and stressful, and the new model will need to
be monitored closely with a full assessment after five years. We are indebted
to the Steering Committee that guided the University through the three-year
development process and now to the Central Budget Committee that will
assume oversight of budget issues.
Increase revenues. We have a serious commitment
to increase institutional revenues while moving tuition increases close
to the cost of inflation. I can report substantial progress. A key factor
has been the willingness of the Legislature to increase the operating
budget for the University by 5% in each of the last two years and again
by 5% in each of the next two years. In addition, the last legislative
session provided the University System with a capital construction commitment
of $100 million over the next six years. This commitment gives the University
the funds to fully renovate Kingsbury Hall and Murkland Hall, an important
step toward the $185 million need presented to the legislature in the
original request. We will continue to work with the Legislature for approval
of the remaining $85 million which includes four of UNHs key science
buildings. In the last session the Legislature also gave initial funding
to provide state matching funds for the private gifts we receive for student
scholarships. In each of these categoriesoperating budget, capital
budget, and student scholarshipsthe state has provided the University
with critically important funds. We are grateful to the Governor and the
legislature for this investment. USNH Trustees, the Chancellors
Office, the business leadership of New Hampshire, the UNH Advocacy Network,
and our local legislators worked very hard with us to communicate the
Universitys needs to the Legislature. Their leadership and efforts
have been invaluable.
Another area where funding increases are benefiting
the University substantially is the area of external research funding.
Five years ago when I arrived, the University had just completed a year
when research funding was at an all time high of $41 million. This last
year research funding came in at $82 million. We get an A+ in this category.
These funds, for the most part, support the work of our faculty and students
in their research endeavors, but from time to time we also receive federal
funds for special facilities. Our Congressional delegation has helped
us immeasurably in this regard. On August 21 we officially opened the
Environmental Technology Building, the second building in our Entrepreneurial
Campus. On the E-Campus, faculty and students work with scientists and
technicians from industry on problems from industry. The other building
on the E-Campus is the Ocean Engineering Building with a new wing that
houses our Ocean Mapping Group and part of the Universitys InterOperability
Laboratory. That laboratory has 160 clients worldwide and employs approximately
60 UNH students to test the compatibility of new computing products with
existing products. Another very important federal grant to the University
in the last year was funding to provide a new marine research facility
and pier on our land in New Castle. This facility will replace our Coastal
Marine Laboratory which is bursting at the seams.
We have worked hard to increase revenues in strategic
areas through our fundraising campaign, The Next Horizon. This $100 million
campaign is designed to support academic programs, faculty, and students.
As we complete the second year, we are proud and grateful to have gifts
at the level of almost $75 million toward the goals of that campaign.
Technology and other infrastructure.
Technology is one of our most important learning
tools. Last year the number of technology-enhanced classrooms on campus
increased from 15 to 25, and we now have substantially greater variety
among these classrooms in terms of size. One of our most popular course-support
software packages is called Blackboard. Two years ago, there were 16 courses
using Blackboard with 873 students enrolled. This semester there are 260
courses with 13,600 student enrollments. Thirty-nine percent of our tenured
and tenure-track faculty have been trained in the use of this software.
The Wide Area Network in New Hampshire, anchored
at UNH, has seen significant growth. The number of videoconferencing sites
has increased from 9 to 16 in one year with a projection of 40 sites by
this time next year.
New Hampshire Public Television is a valuable resource
to the University. The University and NHPTV now participate in a collaboration
within the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to use educational products
from other institutions and stations, and to supply UNH courseware nationally.
There are great opportunities for us in this area. NHPTV is currently
offering college credit courses for students in the New Hampshire Community
Technical College System. NHPTV is also one of the Universitys important
connections to the schools of New Hampshire. With 99% of the schools in
the state enrolled, NHPTV is feeding approximately 200 hours of student
programming a year to the schools and providing professional development
to over 3500 teachers.
Let me also mention an enormous project that will
affect all the UNH staff who carry out our technology, business, and accounting
work. The replacement of the administrative computing system is expected
to go live with the finance portion in January, 2002 and with the human
resources portion next July. This change is a big one, but necessary.
Our old system was last updated a decade ago and runs on hardware that
is no longer manufactured. We can expect the transition to be somewhat
disruptive, but in the end the new system will better meet our needs.
Play an essential role in New Hampshire.
The University of New Hampshire has always played a strong role across
the state. In four of the five last years I have had the privilege of
taking a three day bus trip across the state with new faculty to see where
UNH is working and what is being accomplished. In no year have we duplicated
sites from an earlier year (that is, with the exception of The Balsams,
one of New Hampshires classiest grand hotels in the North Country;
they graciously host us each time we come). So, I have been aware that
University programs were everywhere in our state. But a year ago I asked
our University Relations staff to inventory where our programs were located
and what we were doing in that one year. Even I was surprised at the results:
in the area of business and industry, 665 UNH projects in 88 communities;
with K-12 education, 664 projects in 152 locations; 37 environmental projects
in 33 communities; in health and human services, 143 projects in 27 communities.
And so it goes. That was last year and Im sure this year will be
similar.
An essential part of our being a truly public university
is the role played by UNH Manchester. Last year we were able to dedicate
the fully renovated facility for Manchester programs in the millyard,
thus providing the Manchester campus with appropriate facilities to meet
the Universitys urban mission. We are beginning to see the adaptation
of Manchester programs to their urban audience. We are now able to deliver
professional masters programs at our Manchester site in most professional
areas. Cooperative Extension has offices there and a very vital program
directed toward the needs of the city.
Improve the collective bargaining process.
After a protracted and difficult process, we were able to finalize a contract
for the faculty last October. The Trustees have reaffirmed their commitment
to maintaining compensation levels competitive with the market, not only
for faculty, but for each of our employee groups. Unlike earlier contracts,
this one specifies certain work to be done before the next formal bargaining
session in an effort to develop a more collegial and timely bargaining
process. That work includes identifying comparator institutions for UNH,
developing processes for the distribution of merit salary increases, and
evaluating on a continuing basis the Universitys benefits package.
Im pleased that meetings are being conducted on a regular basis,
that they are productive and collegial, and that it is realistic to expect
this work will lead to more effective and timely negotiations in the future.
THE ACADEMIC PLANNING PROCESS
I have been talking mostly about the last five years
at UNH. Now lets look ahead. A critically important goal for us
has been the long range planning needed in order to build on our strengths
over the next decade. Program planning has been done and done well in
recent years within the units of the University, but we have not had an
institutional framework to give direction and cohesion to unit planning.
Eighteen months ago we undertook an ambitious Academic Planning Process
under the leadership of Provost David Hiley and a creative, committed
steering committee.
Last year we saw the finalizing of two important
stages of the planning process. The first, called Critical Issues, was
finalized last fall, and the more recent goals and strategies document,
An Academic Plan for the Future of the University of New Hampshire, was
released this past summer. Both of these documents are on the University
website and I commend them to your careful reading. This semesters
work will include the implementation plan and the release of the action
plan. Next spring we will work with all University units to revisit and
adjust unit plans to be consistent with and supportive of the institutional
plan. I am confident this comprehensive planning effort will move UNH
to a unique and exceptionally important position within American higher
education.
The most recent planning document provides the University
with statements of values and vision that we have not had before. This
work is not easy. UNH is a land grant institution, but UNH is much more
complex than that. I am so pleased with the work of the Steering Committee
that I have put in your program a card exhibiting the Vision Statement
so that we can talk about it briefly today.
The University of New Hampshire will be distinguished
for combining the living and learning environment of a small New England
liberal arts college with the breadth, spirit of discovery, and civic
commitment of a land grant research institution.
There you have it! The answer to the question "What
is the University of New Hampshire?" We bring together at this University
the best that we know in liberal arts colleges and the best that we know
in land grant research institutions to give our students and our extended
community a university that has very special distinction.
A New England liberal arts college, at its best,
has a primary commitment to undergraduate education and to high quality
teaching. All programs are strongly grounded in the liberal arts. There
is a close relationship between the faculty and students. Students have
opportunities to be engaged in learning in all forms including research.
They have opportunities for leadership, recreation, and intercollegiate
competition. The institution is anchored in its campus locations, has
an attractive and safe physical setting, has a supportive social climate,
and embodies a community of learners with common goals. The administration
is accessible and responsive.
A land grant research institution must have a world-class
faculty. It is sufficiently comprehensive to guarantee that the disciplines
are not isolated and that interdisciplinary work can be facilitated. Research,
scholarship, and creative activity engage all parts of the institution.
Graduate education is a priority and reflects the strengths of the academic
areas. A commitment to service to the state, region, and world is deeply
engrained in the institution. There is a sense of civic commitment, an
understanding that knowledge is pursued not only for its own sake but
also for its applications. The institution recognizes its responsibilities
to business and industry, K-12 education, health issues, the natural environment
and agriculture, the quality of life for all citizens.
This statement is a bold vision for the University
of New Hampshire. Not many other universities have sought to define themselves
this way. The challenge for us is not simply in understanding the strengths
of a New England liberal arts college or the strengths of a land-grant
research university. The challenge is in understanding the implications
of integrating these two visions: how our teaching commitment will be
influenced by the spirit of discovery that guides faculty research and
the civic responsibility so basic to our principles; how our research
and service efforts will be shaped by our commitment to instruction. The
challenge is to ensure that our financial decisions and our policy decisions
are always supportive of this integration and that we have sound ways
to measure success in fulfilling this vision.
Even with the challenges, I am confident that the
integration of a New England liberal arts college and a land grant, major
research university is a realistic vision for UNH because, to a large
extent, we are realizing that vision today. The Universitys research
reputation is very strong. The Undergraduate Research Conference last
spring gave clear evidence that research strengthens instruction and that
the quality of work UNH students do under the supervision of faculty is
high. Our Honors Program, IROP, and UROP programs provide exceptional
opportunities. The Entrepreneurial Campus will provide more. Our residence
halls now offer opportunities for students both to live and to learn together.
The number of courses with a service-learning component continues to grow.
UNH is exceptional in successfully integrating instruction and research
and then providing for the extension of its teaching and research resources
to this region.
THE GENEROSITY OF OTHERS
We know that we have not come to this level without
the commitment and contribution of scores of individuals. Emerson said
that any institution is the lengthened shadow of one person. In truth,
we find the shadows of many persons within the University of New Hampshire.
Benjamin Thompson was our original benefactor. He left us the farmland
that in time became a first-class research university. Over the years
there have been many men and women who helped to shape this institution
and make it what it is today. You know some of them as names of our buildings:
Thompson Hall, Pettee, Dimond, Murkland, McConnell, Horton, and Morse.
But our benefactors are not all in the past. In
our own day, many others are helping the University in significant ways.
The renovated Dimond Library and the new library in Manchester are beautiful
and state-of-the-art because of the gifts received for those facilities.
We will soon complete the Atkins track replacement project providing
our student athletes with one of the finest facilities possible. In recent
months we have filled the McKerley Chair in Health Economics with a senior
scientist from Washington University, and we have filled the Hubbard Chair
in Genomics with a researcher at the top of his field from the University
of Missouri. The Hamel Center for the Management of Technology and Innovation
connects our programs in communication technology, environmental technology,
and biotechnology with our management programs in WSBE to prepare the
next generation of business management and to assist the industry of this
region as it advances. A year from now we will have the first group of
Tyco Science Scholars after a national search to identify the strongest
talent in this area.
Our donors bring us large and small monetary gifts
and much more. They advise our programs and help us identify prospective
students. They encourage our work with their own commitment to UNH. We
have a video so that you can meet some of these individuals and understand
why they have chosen to invest in the University of New Hampshire, and
in a very real sense, in you.
Video
Hubbard Family Award for
Service to Philanthropy
Today when we think of philanthropy at the University
of New Hampshire and in the state of New Hampshire, we think first of
the Hubbard family. Three Hubbard brothers graduated from the University
of New Hampshire in the 20s: Oliver in 1921, Austin in 1925, and
Leslie in 1927. They worked together on a family farm in Walpole, New
Hampshire. Working with a poultry specialist at UNH, they bred a line
of chickens resistant to a destructive bacterial disease of the time,
a breed which came to be called the New Hampshire Red. For three generations
the Hubbard Farms, concentrating on research and development, applied
advanced poultry genetics and modern management techniques to develop
superior breeding stock. In time their agricultural company was operating
in 50 countries providing one of the finest chicken products ever developed.
In 1974 that operation was acquired by the large pharmaceutical firm,
Merck & Company.
The gifts of the Hubbard family to the University
have greatly enhanced our programs in biological sciences, environmental
sciences, climate change research, marine science, and sustainability.
And the Hubbards have generously given need-based scholarships to UNH
students.
In addition, the Hubbard family has shared its deep
values and great vision with the University over several generations.
Austin Hubbard chaired the University Board of Trustees during the time
that the country was ripped by the communist scare in the early 1950s.
New Hampshires attorney general accused some professors and visiting
speakers of having communist leanings. The Trustees stood strong on the
principle of academic freedom and the Universitys need to determine
who would teach and what would be taught.
I am very pleased that the Board of Directors of
the UNH Foundation has established the Hubbard Family Award for Service
to Philanthropy. This Award both honors the Hubbard family and recognizes
individuals whose philanthropic leadership and gifts have significantly
strengthened the University of New Hampshire. I would like to invite Young
Dawkins, President of the Universitys Foundation, to come forward
and present the first recipient of the Hubbard Family Award for Service
to Philanthropy.
[After presentation, construction celebration, announce refreshments,
picnic.]
|